Hi Ray, On 28 Jun 2012, at 15:17, Ray Bellis wrote: > On 28/06/2012 14:51, bugzilla@jessica.w3.org wrote: > >> Unless you or someone else can suggest a convincingly better name for >> setTargetValueAtTime, I think we can close this. > > I did suggest "setTargetValueFromTime" as (IMHO) more grammatically correct. Sorry I missed that. The perils of having the discussion in too many locations. However… I may be misunderstanding the essence of this method, but aren't we talking about a value to be reached at a certain time (or, in other words, a value pre-set for a given time)? Thanks, Olivier
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 19:03:05 UTC