- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 15 Jun 2012 15:38:46 +0000
- To: public-audio@w3.org
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=17399
Robert O'Callahan (Mozilla) <roc@ocallahan.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |roc@ocallahan.org
--- Comment #8 from Robert O'Callahan (Mozilla) <roc@ocallahan.org> 2012-06-15 15:38:45 UTC ---
Was it decided to specify sampling in terms of the number of samples instead of
a time duration?
I prefer the use of a time duration (gives the implementation more flexibility
to be sample-rate-independent), and I thought the discussion on the mailing
list about the minimum delay for DelayNodes was heading that way.
--
Configure bugmail: https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Received on Friday, 15 June 2012 15:38:50 UTC