- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 07 Jun 2012 14:53:52 +0000
- To: public-audio@w3.org
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=17399
Olivier Thereaux <olivier.thereaux@bbc.co.uk> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|RESOLVED |REOPENED
Resolution|FIXED |
--- Comment #3 from Olivier Thereaux <olivier.thereaux@bbc.co.uk> 2012-06-07 14:53:51 UTC ---
Feedback from Philip in
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-audio/2012AprJun/0433.html
«This is certainly an improvement! More feedback:
The sampling of k-rate parameters is not defined, the sensible options
would seem to be either the average value over one working buffer (128
samples) or picking the first, middle or last sample for that work buffer.
In other words, if a signal oscillating between 0 and 1 at 20 KHz
oscillator is used to control delayTime, will it be effectively a constant
0.5 second delay or a "random" delay for each work buffer depending on the
phase of the signal?
Editorial issues:
"Please note that the <code>frequency</code>, <code>Q</code>, and
<code>gain</code> parameters are <em>k-rate</em>" can be replaced with
"All parameters are <em>k-rate</em>".
Lowercase and uppercase MUSTs are now both used, presumably not
intentionally.
Typo: coursely -> coarsely
»
--
Configure bugmail: https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Received on Thursday, 7 June 2012 14:53:59 UTC