- From: Thierry MICHEL <tmichel@w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 01 Jun 2012 09:46:43 +0200
- To: tmichel@w3.org
- CC: Doug Schepers <schepers@w3.org>, olivier Thereaux <olivier.thereaux@bbc.co.uk>, Audio Working Group <public-audio@w3.org>
Doug, Another comment: Please use the final URL for the use cases and requirements document http://www.w3.org/TR/audioproc-reqs/ instead of the editors draft URL https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/audio/raw-file/tip/reqs/Overview.html Thierry. Le 01/06/2012 09:39, Thierry MICHEL a écrit : > > > Le 01/06/2012 02:31, Doug Schepers a écrit : >> Hi, Thierry– >> >> I think you were reading the already-revised version of the charter, >> which reflected the conversation from the telcon. > > I have been reading the *latest* version at the time of my previous > email. My review and proposals applied to that version. > > A couple of comments inline... > >> >> A couple of comments inline... >> >> On 5/31/12 3:11 AM, Thierry MICHEL wrote: >>> >>> >>> Le 30/05/2012 23:25, olivier Thereaux a écrit : >>>> Hello, >>>> >>>> As we were beginning our teleconference call today, Doug shared a >>>> first pass at our new draft charter: >>>> http://www.w3.org/2011/audio/charter/2012/charter-proposed.html >>>> >>>> Please have a read and comment/suggest in the next few days. >>>> >>>> A few things we noted on the call: >>>> >>>> * It is no longer necessary to mention the incubator (since we are >>>> re-chartering the existing WG) >>>> * The scope section should mention the goals of the MIDI work >>>> * The deliverables list should include the use cases and requirements >>>> doc >>> >>> It already mentions it as other non-normative documents, in section 2.1 >>> >>> It currently lists "Test suites for each specification", but it should >>> also say "implementation report". >> >> Added. > > There is some wording in the 1.1 section Success Criteria, but I don't > see any mention of "implementation report" in the section "Other > non-normative documents may be created such as": It only mentions > Testsuite. > >> >> >>>> * The expected milestones for the web audio API should be, per our >>>> latest discussions: >>>> FPWD: Dec 2011 >>>> LC: Q4 2012 >>>> CR: Q2 2013 >>>> PR: Q4 2013 >>>> REC: Q4 2013 >>> >>> The expected milestones for the MIDI Device Communication API should >>> also be extended. >> >> I don't think so... Olivier, please correct me if those are wrong, too. > > These MIDI milestones may have been discussed during my leave, and I > have missed it (not yet catch up on all my emails). Do you have a > pointer to that ? > > I am only highlighting that the MIDI spec is planed to publish its first > Public draft Q3 2012 (9 months after the PFWD of Web Audio API Dec 2011) > and it is planned to reach CR Q2 2013 (at the same time as the MIDI spec). > This seem very optimistic, under these considerations: > - The Web Audio API spec was elaborated a long time before it became a > FPWD in the Audio WG, during the incubator Group. There are already > implementations. > > - Currently the MIDI spec is only a initial draft. The implementation > experience is low. > > I certainly will not oppose to these milestones, just checking that they > are credible. > > >> >> >>> The following Note mentions "initial schedule", but we should also >>> mentions deliverable changes (this is why we are indeed requesting a >>> charter renewal). >>> >>> "Note: The group will document significant changes from this initial >>> schedule on the group home page. " >>> >>> I would say: >>> >>> Note: The group will document significant changes from its initial >>> charter [ adding here a link to the initial charter] on the group home >>> page. >> >> I added a link to the wiki, and to the initial charter elsewhere, but >> didn't use this precise wording. > > OK. > >> >> >>>> (which I guess changes the end date of the new charter?) >>> >>> Right. plus we need to include 6 months after Rec. >> >> I think current end date is roughly accurate; we'll revise it after we >> know more from the review. > > > If both specs reach REC as planned before end 2013, the current end date > of the charter "01 July 2014" is accurate in consideration of a 6 months > after Rec phase. > > > Best, > > Thierry. > > >> >> Regards- >> -Doug >> >
Received on Friday, 1 June 2012 07:49:35 UTC