- From: Robert O'Callahan <robert@ocallahan.org>
- Date: Thu, 17 May 2012 10:41:44 +1200
- To: Chris Rogers <crogers@google.com>
- Cc: Philip Jägenstedt <philipj@opera.com>, public-audio@w3.org
Received on Wednesday, 16 May 2012 22:42:14 UTC
On Thu, May 17, 2012 at 10:37 AM, Robert O'Callahan <robert@ocallahan.org>wrote: > I understand that that is well defined. Very small delays do impose > significant implementation constraints, however. > What I'm getting at, of course, is that if you have a very large arbitrary cycle of nodes, containing a single DelayNode which delays by a single sample, then you need to iterate over all the nodes in the cycle producing one output sample per node, once per sample. That will require alternative code paths to the normal, more efficient paths that use SIMD to process multiple samples per node. Rob -- “You have heard that it was said, ‘Love your neighbor and hate your enemy.’ But I tell you, love your enemies and pray for those who persecute you, that you may be children of your Father in heaven. ... If you love those who love you, what reward will you get? Are not even the tax collectors doing that? And if you greet only your own people, what are you doing more than others?" [Matthew 5:43-47]
Received on Wednesday, 16 May 2012 22:42:14 UTC