- From: Chris Rogers <crogers@google.com>
- Date: Wed, 16 May 2012 15:01:42 -0700
- To: robert@ocallahan.org
- Cc: Philip Jägenstedt <philipj@opera.com>, public-audio@w3.org
- Message-ID: <CA+EzO0m2_VxPGtgqepDNeB7g4Kzge1Q=3-MKYnXspAKzYJtu=Q@mail.gmail.com>
On Wed, May 16, 2012 at 2:55 PM, Robert O'Callahan <robert@ocallahan.org>wrote: > On Thu, May 17, 2012 at 9:46 AM, Robert O'Callahan <robert@ocallahan.org>wrote: > >> Ah, thanks, I should have remembered that. Then resolving ISSUE-24 will >> require specification of a processing model that handles cycles. I would >> like resolving that to be quite high priority as it will have significant >> impact on the architecture of any implementation. >> > > [Two things I'm particularly curious about: how to handle cycles that > don't contain a DelayNode > In signal processing terms this is undefined or non-sensical. > , and how to handle a cycle containing a DelayNode with very small > delayTime, e.g. a single sample.] > This is well defined in signal processing. In fact many common filters (IIR filters such as the biquad) are implemented this way. > > Rob > -- > “You have heard that it was said, ‘Love your neighbor and hate your > enemy.’ But I tell you, love your enemies and pray for those who persecute > you, that you may be children of your Father in heaven. ... If you love > those who love you, what reward will you get? Are not even the tax > collectors doing that? And if you greet only your own people, what are you > doing more than others?" [Matthew 5:43-47] > >
Received on Wednesday, 16 May 2012 22:02:11 UTC