- From: Robert O'Callahan <robert@ocallahan.org>
- Date: Thu, 17 May 2012 08:05:50 +1200
- To: Chris Rogers <crogers@google.com>
- Cc: Philip Jägenstedt <philipj@opera.com>, public-audio@w3.org
Received on Wednesday, 16 May 2012 20:06:20 UTC
On Thu, May 17, 2012 at 7:41 AM, Chris Rogers <crogers@google.com> wrote: > We've already had extensive and very detailed discussions about latency > and synchronization, including issue 56 below. Timed text events could > certainly be used to apply appropriate audio processing: > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-audio/2012AprJun/0066.html > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-audio/2012AprJun/0084.html > Which I replied to here: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-audio/2012AprJun/0085.html What you proposed would lose data, as far as I can tell. Rob -- “You have heard that it was said, ‘Love your neighbor and hate your enemy.’ But I tell you, love your enemies and pray for those who persecute you, that you may be children of your Father in heaven. ... If you love those who love you, what reward will you get? Are not even the tax collectors doing that? And if you greet only your own people, what are you doing more than others?" [Matthew 5:43-47]
Received on Wednesday, 16 May 2012 20:06:20 UTC