- From: Olli Pettay <Olli.Pettay@helsinki.fi>
- Date: Wed, 16 May 2012 02:37:39 +0300
- To: robert@ocallahan.org
- CC: Chris Rogers <crogers@google.com>, Philip Jägenstedt <philipj@opera.com>, public-audio@w3.org
On 05/16/2012 02:15 AM, Robert O'Callahan wrote: > On Wed, May 16, 2012 at 10:33 AM, Olli Pettay <Olli.Pettay@helsinki.fi <mailto:Olli.Pettay@helsinki.fi>> wrote: > > On 05/16/2012 01:26 AM, Robert O'Callahan wrote: > > One thing that is going to be really important when addressing this feedback is understanding the existing compatibility constraints. As I > said in an > earlier email, if Webkit is unwilling to take a change, due to compatibility concerns, then we probably don't want to take that change in the > spec either. > > > What compatibility concerns? We're talking about an early draft of a spec, which is even implemented prefixed. > Changing the spec sure should be possible. > > > Google has heavily evangelized use of Web Audio in production apps. It has been presented as *the* solution for audio processing, without caveats. That sounds like a bug in Google evangelism process. Or is it the case that they have evangelized for Chrome Web Apps (or whatever is the right term). Those are in a walled garden, so not really part of the web. -Olli > Google people told me they're not willing to break compatibility with the content created under those assumptions. > > Rob > -- > “You have heard that it was said, ‘Love your neighbor and hate your enemy.’ But I tell you, love your enemies and pray for those who persecute you, > that you may be children of your Father in heaven. ... If you love those who love you, what reward will you get? Are not even the tax collectors doing > that? And if you greet only your own people, what are you doing more than others?" [Matthew 5:43-47] >
Received on Tuesday, 15 May 2012 23:38:30 UTC