- From: Raymond Toy <rtoy@google.com>
- Date: Mon, 28 Nov 2011 14:47:02 -0800
- To: Alistair MacDonald <al@signedon.com>
- Cc: Chris Rogers <crogers@google.com>, public-audio@w3.org
Received on Thursday, 1 December 2011 09:34:09 UTC
On Mon, Nov 28, 2011 at 1:50 PM, Alistair MacDonald <al@signedon.com> wrote: > Wondered what your thoughts were on this? > > > An alternative would be to do something like -(v2-v1*e)/(e-1) + (v2-v1)/(e-1)*exp(t/T) In this case at t = 0, the value is v1 and at t = T, the value is v2. This has the advantage over the previous method of actually reaching value2 at time T. Perhaps this is more in line with what the webaudio api wants. Ray
Received on Thursday, 1 December 2011 09:34:09 UTC