Re: webrtc telco

On Fri, Sep 30, 2011 at 4:48 PM, Rob Manson <roBman@mob-labs.com> wrote:

> On that topic (see my earlier emails too Rob...but this may be as much a
> question for Doug and Al, etc. now) is there any reason this would
> "just" come under the Audio WG?
>
> This proposal already mentions video and canvas recording.
>
> It would be really good if we could have a consistent way of
> processing/accessing MediaStream Tracks data.
>

Yes, that is definitely my goal.


>
> http://hg.mozilla.org/users/rocallahan_mozilla.com/specs/raw-file/tip/StreamProcessing/StreamProcessing.html
>

That's the bones of an API for processing/accessing all kinds of MediaStream
data.

http://html5labs.interoperabilitybridges.com/streamsapi/
>

This could be a useful API but is really nothing to do with media streams.


> https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/audio/raw-file/tip/webaudio/specification.html
>

:-)

https://wiki.mozilla.org/Audio_Data_API
>

Mostly superseded by Web Audio and MediaStream Processing, although a
similar API for main-thread access to samples could easily be provided
alongside MediaStream Processing.

http://dev.w3.org/2011/webrtc/editor/webrtc.html#mediastreamrecorder
>

MediaStream Processing builds on this and assumes it will be available.


> http://www.w3.org/TR/2010/WD-media-capture-api-20100928/
> http://www.w3.org/TR/2011/WD-html-media-capture-20110414/
>

These seem to compete directly with the MediaStreams-based proposals that
introduce navigator.getUserMedia. I prefer MediaStreams and the getUserMedia
approach.

Rob
-- 
"If we claim to be without sin, we deceive ourselves and the truth is not in
us. If we confess our sins, he is faithful and just and will forgive us our
sins and purify us from all unrighteousness. If we claim we have not sinned,
we make him out to be a liar and his word is not in us." [1 John 1:8-10]