- From: Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>
- Date: Sat, 11 Jun 2011 04:41:22 +0000 (UTC)
- To: Chris Rogers <crogers@google.com>
- cc: public-audio@w3.org
On Fri, 10 Jun 2011, Chris Rogers wrote: > On Fri, Jun 10, 2011 at 6:41 PM, Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch> wrote: > > > > (Sorry for breaking threading, I wasn't on the list until now.) > > > > One last thing: I'm not convinced that audio APIs are really the next > > most important thing to work on on the Web platform. There are tons of > > new APIs already being proposed; so much so that implementation > > quality is suffering (the biggest indicator of that being the > > continued lack of comprehensive test suites for large parts of the > > platform, including such fundamentals as HTML). > > Hi Ian. For what it's worth, a comprehensive test suite is very much a > priority for us. We've adapted both WebKit's mac and chrome port of > DumpRenderTree and run-webkit-layout-tests to handle audio within the > last week. I've written seven "layout" tests so far, and have many more > planned for the near future. So, whatever reason there is for *not* > having an audio api, this is not a good reason. I wasn't referring to the lack of an Audio API test suite, but to the general state of multivendor test suites for all Web technologies. -- Ian Hickson U+1047E )\._.,--....,'``. fL http://ln.hixie.ch/ U+263A /, _.. \ _\ ;`._ ,. Things that are impossible just take longer. `._.-(,_..'--(,_..'`-.;.'
Received on Saturday, 11 June 2011 04:41:54 UTC