- From: Ian Jacobs <ij@w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 8 Mar 2023 10:19:20 -0600
- To: Michiel de Jong <michiel@pondersource.com>, Joep Meindertsma <joep@ontola.io>
- Cc: Team Community Process <team-community-process@w3.org>, public-atomic-data@w3.org
Hi Michiel, Thank you for the links to the documents. From the information on the Atomic Data Rust repo, for example, It’s not clear to me that those documents have been published as deliverables of the CG, and thus not under the terms of the contributor agreement that people signed when they joined the group; see also expectations for CG reports [1]. Could you help me understand whether the group considers these “CG deliverables”? If so, it would be great to clarify that in the document(s) and add links to those documents from the CG system to help people find them. I have updated your CG home page to point to your Discord instance (instead of IRC): https://discord.gg/a72Rv2P Thanks! Ian [1] https://www.w3.org/community/reports/reqs/ > On Mar 8, 2023, at 3:18 AM, Michiel de Jong <michiel@pondersource.com> wrote: > > Hi! > > Please don't close this community group, it is not inactive - look for instance at: > > https://github.com/atomicdata-dev/atomic-data-rust > https://github.com/atomicdata-dev/atomic-data-browser > https://docs.atomicdata.dev/ > https://www.ngi.eu/funded_solution/atomicdata/ > > Thanks! > Michiel. > > On Mon, 6 Mar 2023 at 19:28, Team Community Process <team-community-process@w3.org> wrote: > Dear participants in the > > Atomic Data Community Group > https://www.w3.org/community/atomic-data/ > > Your Community Group appears to have become inactive (per [1]). W3C plans to close this group in 10 days unless we hear compelling reasons from you to keep it open. > > Thank you, > > CG/BG System > > [1] https://www.w3.org/community/about/faq/#close-inactive > > > -- Ian Jacobs <ij@w3.org> https://www.w3.org/People/Jacobs/ Tel: +1 917 450 8783
Received on Wednesday, 8 March 2023 16:19:22 UTC