- From: Greg Gay <greg.gay@ryerson.ca>
- Date: Thu, 7 Mar 2019 16:24:14 -0500
- To: public-atag2-comments@w3.org
- Message-ID: <36300307-2a7f-4691-fc9f-ba3fb5cf53be@ryerson.ca>
Hi WAI Just noticed what seems to be a couple editorial errors in ATAG 2.0, in the rationale statement for Guideline B.2.4 and in SC B.2.4.4 https://www.w3.org/TR/ATAG20/#gl_b24 Rationale: Providing accessible templates (WCAG) <https://www.w3.org/TR/ATAG20/#def-Accessible-Template> can have several benefits, including: immediately improving the accessibility of the web content (WCAG) <https://www.w3.org/TR/ATAG20/#def-Accessible-Web-Content> _/*of */__/*being edited*/_, reducing the effort required of authors <https://www.w3.org/TR/ATAG20/#def-Author>, and demonstrating the importance of accessible web content (WCAG). The word "of" in "of being edited" should not be there. ....and B.2.4.4 Accessible Template Options (Enhanced): If the authoring tool <https://www.w3.org/TR/ATAG20/#def-Authoring-Tool> provides templates <https://www.w3.org/TR/ATAG20/#def-Template>, then all of the templates are accessible template (to WCAG Level AA) <https://www.w3.org/TR/ATAG20/#def-Accessible-Template>. (*Level AAA*) Should the 3rd instance of the word "template" be plural? -- Greg Gay IT Accessibility Specialist Digital Education Strategies The G. Raymond Chang School of Continuing Education Ryerson University Tel: 416 979-5000 #2061
Received on Thursday, 7 March 2019 21:54:32 UTC