- From: Guntur Wiseno Putra <gsenopu@gmail.com>
- Date: Sat, 4 Jan 2020 00:24:26 +0700
- To: "public-informationarchitecture@w3.org" <public-informationarchitecture@w3.org>, "public-art@w3.org" <public-art@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <CAKi_AEtbFm__Ms_9NKi8_rADhpMW7_cQ8QDPkNL1PeP+GJeCiQ@mail.gmail.com>
Dear public-informationarchitecture, Thinking on "cyberspace", "webspace", "realspace", "communications networks", "information networks" & "society" in terms of strategic planning, strategic navigation, may suggest a matter on "frame of reference" shown below: "The planes of immanence and organisation exist simultaneously and are intertwined; sometimes fairly closely and sometimes more loosely. We inhabit both planes at once. Multiplanar theory thus comprises broad trajectories or “visions” — such as sustainability, habitability and so on — as frames of reference which provide justification and navigational context for short and medium-term substantive actions, such as major projects". (J. Hillier, "Strategic Navigation: a Multiplanar Methodology for Strategic Spatial Planning", EspacesTemps.net, 2015) https://www.espacestemps.net/en/articles/strategic-navigation/ Regard, Guntur Wiseno Putra Pada Sabtu, 07 Desember 2019, Guntur Wiseno Putra <gsenopu@gmail.com> menulis: > Dear public-informationarchitecture & public-art, > > To Deleuze & Guattari's "architecture as frame" there is one with such > nuances: Jacques Derrida's "parergon" meaning, among others, frame, "both > in the sense of physical limit around a painting and also in the more > conceptual sense of a "frame of reference". It is Cheetam's attempt "to > deploy his (Derrida's) reflections on the sublime within a narrative about > disciplinarity. (Cheetam, Mark. A, "Kant, Art, and Art History, Cambridge > University Press, 2001 pp. 103-14, especially p. 104) > > > > > Regard, > Guntur Wiseno Putra > > Pada Jumat, 09 Agustus 2019, Guntur Wiseno Putra <gsenopu@gmail.com> > menulis: > >> Dear public-informationarchitecture@w3.org >> & public-art@w3.org, >> >> This is the link to the page of my message to the >> architecture-discuss@ietf.org: >> >> https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/architecture-discuss/5 >> axuB2YTHca9age3oBoRyDNLyhA >> >> Regard, >> Guntur Wiseno Putra >> >> >> >> >> >> Pada Jumat, 09 Agustus 2019, Guntur Wiseno Putra <gsenopu@gmail.com> >> menulis: >> >>> Dear public-informationarchitecture@w3.org >>> & public-art@w3.org, >>> >>> >>> >>> To share what might be inspiring... >>> >>> >>> >>> In order to propose what should be understood as "concept", "percept" & >>> "affect", thus as "philosophy" & "art", Deleuze & Guattari ("What is >>> Philosophy?") mentioned architecture as the first art as art begins with >>> house: that of which "the most scientific architecture continually produces >>> and unifies planes and sections... it could be defined as "frame" with a >>> connection among various frames oriented differently, applied to other >>> arts...(There is) a composite system consisting of points and >>> counterpoints... (there is) a matter of sensations (percepts and affects) >>> combined... (While) the system still needs a composition plane run >>> "deframing" opening ways from house territory to city-cosmos, the system in >>> which there are cosmic forces to create new affects...". >>> >>> There is "asthetic composition" as the working of sensation which is, so >>> they said, the definition of art... >>> >>> >>> (I sent also the message to architecture-duscuss@ietf.org 24 July 2019) >>> >>> Regard, >>> Guntur Wiseno Putra >>> >>> Pada Kamis, 18 April 2019, Guntur Wiseno Putra <gsenopu@gmail.com> >>> menulis: >>> >>>> Dear All, >>>> >>>> May this topic link with a mailing list managed by IETF ( >>>> architecture-discuss@ietf.org) as I have just sent a related message >>>> "Internet and Architecture as Art" >>>> >>>> https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/architecture-discuss/f >>>> YULSuItSnyZL1J-qb1XnH0ttIU >>>> >>>> ...? >>>> >>>> Regard, >>>> Guntur Wiseno Putra >>>> >>>> Pada Rabu, 17 April 2019, Guntur Wiseno Putra <gsenopu@gmail.com> >>>> menulis: >>>> >>>>> Dear All, >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Should we supposedly read on the Internet as networks of computer >>>>> enabling, among others, hypertext connections which is the Web. Thus we may >>>>> refer "Information Architecture/Art" to the Internet Web Architecture/Art . >>>>> >>>>> For the distinction between the Internet and the Web: >>>>> >>>>> https://www.w3.org/People/Berners-Lee/FAQ.html#InternetWeb >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Regard, >>>>> Guntur Wiseno Putra >>>>> >>>>> Pada Rabu, 17 April 2019, Guntur Wiseno Putra <gsenopu@gmail.com> >>>>> menulis: >>>>> >>>>>> Dear All, >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> If we may say about "Architecture" is/as "Art" --regarding what >>>>>> Francis D.K. Ching said in his "Architecture: Form, Space and Order", John >>>>>> Wiley & Sons Inc, 2007, p. IX--, then "Information Architecture" is/as >>>>>> "Information Art". >>>>>> >>>>>> Thus supposedly this research may work for the connection: >>>>>> >>>>>> ".art: Situating Internet Art in the Traditional Institution of >>>>>> Contemporary Art" >>>>>> >>>>>> http://dspace.mit.edu/handle/1721.1/39149 >>>>>> >>>>>> discussing key players, institutions, and discourses on aesthetics, >>>>>> economy, and exhibition methodologies to frame a sociological analysis... >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> Regard, >>>>>> Guntur Wiseno Putra >>>>>> >>>>>
Received on Friday, 3 January 2020 17:24:30 UTC