Re: Information, Architecture, and Art...

Dear public-informationarchitecture & public-art,

To Deleuze & Guattari's "architecture as frame" there is one with such
nuances: Jacques Derrida's "parergon" meaning, among others, frame, "both
in the sense of physical limit around a painting and also in the more
conceptual sense of a "frame of reference". It is Cheetam's attempt "to
deploy his (Derrida's) reflections on the sublime within a narrative about
disciplinarity. (Cheetam, Mark. A, "Kant, Art, and Art History, Cambridge
University Press, 2001 pp. 103-14, especially p. 104)




Regard,
Guntur Wiseno Putra

Pada Jumat, 09 Agustus 2019, Guntur Wiseno Putra <gsenopu@gmail.com>
menulis:

> Dear public-informationarchitecture@w3.org
> & public-art@w3.org,
>
> This is the link to the page of my message to the
> architecture-discuss@ietf.org:
>
> https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/architecture-discuss/
> 5axuB2YTHca9age3oBoRyDNLyhA
>
> Regard,
> Guntur Wiseno Putra
>
>
>
>
>
> Pada Jumat, 09 Agustus 2019, Guntur Wiseno Putra <gsenopu@gmail.com>
> menulis:
>
>> Dear public-informationarchitecture@w3.org
>> & public-art@w3.org,
>>
>>
>>
>> To share what might be inspiring...
>>
>>
>>
>> In order to propose what should be understood as "concept", "percept" &
>> "affect", thus as "philosophy" & "art", Deleuze & Guattari ("What is
>> Philosophy?") mentioned architecture as the first art as art begins with
>> house: that of which "the most scientific architecture continually produces
>> and unifies planes and sections... it could be defined as "frame" with a
>> connection among various frames oriented differently, applied to other
>> arts...(There is) a composite system consisting of points and
>> counterpoints... (there is) a matter of sensations (percepts and affects)
>> combined... (While) the system still needs a composition plane run
>> "deframing" opening ways from house territory to city-cosmos, the system in
>> which there are cosmic forces to create new affects...".
>>
>> There is "asthetic composition" as the working of sensation which is, so
>> they said, the definition of art...
>>
>>
>> (I sent also the message to architecture-duscuss@ietf.org 24 July 2019)
>>
>> Regard,
>> Guntur Wiseno Putra
>>
>> Pada Kamis, 18 April 2019, Guntur Wiseno Putra <gsenopu@gmail.com>
>> menulis:
>>
>>> Dear All,
>>>
>>> May this topic link with a mailing list managed by IETF (
>>> architecture-discuss@ietf.org) as I have just sent a related message
>>> "Internet and Architecture as Art"
>>>
>>> https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/architecture-discuss/f
>>> YULSuItSnyZL1J-qb1XnH0ttIU
>>>
>>> ...?
>>>
>>> Regard,
>>> Guntur Wiseno Putra
>>>
>>> Pada Rabu, 17 April 2019, Guntur Wiseno Putra <gsenopu@gmail.com>
>>> menulis:
>>>
>>>> Dear All,
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Should we supposedly read on the Internet as networks of computer
>>>> enabling, among others, hypertext connections which is the Web. Thus we may
>>>> refer "Information Architecture/Art" to the Internet Web Architecture/Art .
>>>>
>>>> For the distinction between the Internet and the Web:
>>>>
>>>> https://www.w3.org/People/Berners-Lee/FAQ.html#InternetWeb
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Regard,
>>>> Guntur Wiseno Putra
>>>>
>>>> Pada Rabu, 17 April 2019, Guntur Wiseno Putra <gsenopu@gmail.com>
>>>> menulis:
>>>>
>>>>> Dear All,
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> If we may say about "Architecture" is/as "Art" --regarding what
>>>>> Francis D.K. Ching said in his "Architecture: Form, Space and Order", John
>>>>> Wiley & Sons Inc, 2007, p. IX--, then "Information Architecture" is/as
>>>>> "Information Art".
>>>>>
>>>>> Thus supposedly this research may work for the connection:
>>>>>
>>>>> ".art: Situating Internet Art in the Traditional Institution of
>>>>> Contemporary Art"
>>>>>
>>>>> http://dspace.mit.edu/handle/1721.1/39149
>>>>>
>>>>> discussing key players, institutions, and discourses on aesthetics,
>>>>> economy, and exhibition methodologies to frame a sociological analysis...
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Regard,
>>>>> Guntur Wiseno Putra
>>>>>
>>>>