Re: Meeting to discuss test case development and repositories

I can do 10 central.

On Jan 22, 2017 11:30 AM, "Gunderson, Jon R" <jongund@illinois.edu> wrote:

> Joanie and Shane,
>
> How about earlier in the day like 10:00am or 11:00am Central Standard time
> (Chicago Local Time)?
>
> Jon
>
>
>
>
>
> On 1/21/17, 12:25 PM, "Joanmarie Diggs" <jdiggs@igalia.com> wrote:
>
> >Is there any possibility of meeting earlier? I tend to live and work on
> >a CET-based schedule. And 4:00 PM Central Time is 11:00 PM CET.
> >--joanie
> >
> >On 2017-01-21 12:22, Shane McCarron wrote:
> >> I am available Wednesday at 4.  I have a couple of things to finish up
> for
> >> Rich / Joanie in the ATTA processor and wiki parser so that we *can*
> >> continue to use that.
> >>
> >> We can also encourage people to put tests into the GH repo directly
> through
> >> pull requests.  There is a WPT process for this that is easy to manage
> if
> >> you grok github.  If you don't it is inscrutable.
> >>
> >> On Fri, Jan 20, 2017 at 3:13 PM, Gunderson, Jon R <jongund@illinois.edu
> >
> >> wrote:
> >>
> >>> Shane and Joanie,
> >>>
> >>> On yesterday’s ARIA call there was discussion of how to create and
> manage
> >>> test cases.
> >>> If I understood Joanie’s position is that she would rather see a
> >>> repository of test case files, rather than a converter form a wiki.
> >>> Looking at the project I agree that the Wiki is not going to be a good
> way
> >>> to support the development of test cases, I think we should have a
> >>> repository and just works on test case files directly.
> >>> This will make it easier for other people to contribute and review
> without
> >>> worrying about people making wiki markup errors and colliding with
> other
> >>> updates on the wiki page.
> >>> Is there a time we can meet next week, maybe like at our old Wednesday
> at
> >>> 4:00pm Central Time to discuss this issue?
> >>>
> >>> I have a new student who is going to help with MSAA+IAccessible2 ATTA
> >>> development and I plan on focusing on this issue till we get it
> working.
> >>>
> >>> Thanks,
> >>> Jon
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >
>