- From: Peter Krautzberger <peter@krautzource.com>
- Date: Tue, 19 Mar 2024 17:23:18 +0100
- To: Valerie Young <spectranaut@igalia.com>
- Cc: public-aria-editors@w3.org
Received on Tuesday, 19 March 2024 16:23:37 UTC
Hi, Thanks for the notes. RE the label for 2147. I apologize for not having written more clearly. I was thinking of something to cover potential deprecation. We have "no consensus" as a github label but that didn't seem to fit. Something for the flowTo situation would be more like "potentially deprecated" or "problematic AT support". Anyway, just a label for features and project is a good start. Peter. Am Mo., 18. März 2024 um 17:23 Uhr schrieb Valerie Young < spectranaut@igalia.com>: > Hello everyone -- we had a brief meeting: > > Some notes: > > * [new] label for things like aria #2147 > > Punted because...we can't test? No, too many things in that > > Let's makes project for "data viz" and put it in there > > Also: Label per aria feature??? Like, "aria-flowto". Everyone agrees. > > * [new] mono-repo F2F meeting > > ARIA f2f punted, we will have to organize an async one. > > Other things: > > - Future aria editors call: close old irrelevant issues marathon >
Received on Tuesday, 19 March 2024 16:23:37 UTC