Re: wiki in the ARIA repository

I've filed https://github.com/w3c/respec/issues/4436, linking to two other
issues related to note.

Peter.

Am Mo., 24. Apr. 2023 um 17:35 Uhr schrieb James Nurthen <w3c@nurthen.com>:

> Honestly I don’t recall the editor’s notes for this needing to be removed
> prior to publication. Indeed I think it makes sense to have somne sort of
> note whether its an editors note or something else.
>
>
>
> *From: *Peter Krautzberger <peter@krautzource.com>
> *Date: *Monday, April 24, 2023 at 3:15 AM
> *To: *Matt King <a11ythinker@gmail.com>
> *Cc: *Valerie Young <spectranaut@igalia.com>, public-aria-editors@w3.org <
> public-aria-editors@w3.org>
> *Subject: *Re: wiki in the ARIA repository
>
> Hi Matt,
>
>
>
> We can definitely keep the page on combobox in the wiki -- since, as you
> point out, it's linked from 1.2, we definitely should.
>
>
>
> In general, I feel like the documentation folder in the main repository
> could be a more suitable place for this kind of content, to separate it
> from the more ephemeral nature of wiki pages.
>
>
>
> @James can you comment on the first question?
>
>
>
> For the second, a quick search turned up
> https://github.com/w3c/respec/issues/1752
>
>
>
> Best,
>
> Peter.
>
>
>
> Am So., 23. Apr. 2023 um 18:54 Uhr schrieb Matt King <
> a11ythinker@gmail.com>:
>
> Peter,
>
>
>
> I’d like to keep the page:
>
> “Resolving ARIA 1.1 Combobox Issues”
>
> Someplace accessible. It is an important record of considerations that we
> still sometimes need to reference. Given the speed at which the web
> platform moves, I don’t see that need going away in the next 5+ years.
>
>
>
> I am willing to move the combobox content to a gist in my GitHub account
> if there are good reasons for removing it from the wiki. However, I feel it
> is more appropriate to keep it in the wiki. Another option is moving it
> into a closed issue. That seems a little weird, but again is better than
> deleting and reasonable if there is a sound rationale. It is weird in that
> it would have a high issue number and the presentation of content and
> heading structure doesn’t fit well in an issue -- it is written as a
> document.
>
>
>
> I don’t see any harm leaving it where it is in the wiki. Leaving it in
> place has the advantage that the links in the old working drafts of the
> specs will not break. The drafts stay in TR, so breaking the links is
> probably not a good idea.
>
>
>
> That brings up two related questions:
>
>    1. Why are the editor’s notes still in the 1.2 document? Weren’t they
>    supposed to be removed at CR exit?
>    2. Respec is still giving the Notes the wrong heading level. Can
>    someone remind  me where the issue for that is? I’d like to see if we can
>    get that fixed. Seems like a simple issue that should have been resolved by
>    now.
>
>
>
> Matt
>
>
>
> *From:* Peter Krautzberger <peter@krautzource.com>
> *Sent:* Friday, April 21, 2023 3:11 AM
> *To:* Valerie Young <spectranaut@igalia.com>
> *Cc:* public-aria-editors@w3.org
> *Subject:* Re: wiki in the ARIA repository
>
>
>
> Thanks, Valerie!
>
>
>
> Before yesterday's meeting, James had some interest in keeping archival
> copies for interested people.
>
>
>
> I'm of two minds here; I think archives are important but I also think it
> can be problematic to have outdated, official looking documents around.
>
>
>
> But maybe in practice it's not a big deal -- most wiki pages have moved
> into the spec (e.g., 1.2 and 1.3 planning, annotation draft).
>
>
>
> @james can you take a look at what documents you'd find of interest to
> keep?
>
>
>
> The pages that struck me as still interesting: css-aam, non-modal dialogs,
> attribute parity, test separation.
>
>
>
> Best,
>
> Peter.
>
>
>
> Am Do., 20. Apr. 2023 um 22:25 Uhr schrieb Valerie Young <
> spectranaut@igalia.com>:
>
> Hey Peter,
>
> I deleted the pages I moved to the "documentation" folder and update the
> links on the main wiki page to point to the documentation folder instead
> of the (now deleted) wiki pages.
>
> Also I found another documentation like page and deleted it, as
> everything was covered.
>
> Also I noticed there was an IRC cheat cheat being pointed to and move
> that document, see: https://github.com/w3c/aria/pull/1920
>
> Every other page (except the ARIA F2F page) I have no opinion on!
>
> Val
>
> On 4/20/23 01:38, Peter Krautzberger wrote:
> > Hi editors,
> >
> > I was looking at https://github.com/w3c/aria/issues/1882 again today.
> >
> > I believe we decided that all stale wiki pages can be deleted and all
> > long term documents would move to the folder "documentation" in the
> > main repository.
> >
> > I checked that the git repository will keep deleted pages safe in its
> > history - but there's no UI for looking up deleted pages.
> >
> > Could everyone please take a quick look if you have anything you want
> > to move to the documentation folder? In that case, please add a
> > comment to a page that you want to preserve.
> >
> > If I don't hear anything, I'll start deleting pages.
> >
> > Best,
> > Peter.
>
>