- From: Michael Cooper <cooper@w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 4 Mar 2016 16:54:48 -0500
- To: Joseph Scheuhammer <clown@alum.mit.edu>, Shane McCarron <shane@aptest.com>
- Cc: ARIA Editors <public-aria-editors@w3.org>
On 04/03/2016 4:46 PM, Joseph Scheuhammer wrote: > Michael, > > I assume you received Shane's email quoted below about reverting to an > older ReSpec. A couple of questions. > > 1. Do we want to use the older version for the heartbeats next week? Yes, if we're going to be able to publish at all. Note the publication is for the week after - I'm asking editors to have them ready (and approved for publication) by next week so I can queue up the publications. > > 2. Do we want to use the 'useExperimentalStyles' for the heartbeats? We have to - we won't be allowed to publish without the new styles in place. Michael > > I'll start the ball rolling for the core-aam and accname-aam by > assuming "yes" to the first question, and changing which verison of > respect they use. I'm inclined to avoid the experimental style > sheets, so I'll go that route unless you say otherwise. > > BTW, thanks Shane! > > On 2016-03-04 4:14 PM, Shane McCarron wrote: >> Folks, >> >> We (marcosc and I) know that ReSpec has been unstable the last week. >> We are really really sorry. We are working hard to settle things down. >> >> In the interim, we are aware that many of you need to get things >> done, and that an unstable respec is making that challenging. If you >> are running into issues, you are welcome to use a version of it that >> I have put up on a server from before we broke the world: >> >> https://spec-ops.io/respec-w3c-common.js >> >> If you want to use this, just comment out your current ReSpec line >> and add a line like: >> >> <script src='https://spec-ops.io/respec-w3c-common.js' >> class='remove'></script> >> >> This is version 3.2.97. So if you want the new "styles" you should >> set the useExperimentalStyles variable to true. >> >> Again, sorry! >> >> -- >> Shane McCarron >> Managing Director, Applied Testing and Technology, Inc. > >
Received on Friday, 4 March 2016 21:54:50 UTC