- From: Michael Cooper <cooper@w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 12 Apr 2016 16:11:02 -0400
- To: Joseph Scheuhammer <clown@alum.mit.edu>, public-aria-editors@w3.org
- Message-ID: <570D5656.7020005@w3.org>
It's a good question. A starter proposal at an answer but open to alternate is: 1) The current github.io URIs be "current version" whatever that is, for now. 2) We set up separate versioned URIs going forward, e.g, w3c.github.io/aria/1.1/* and so forth. 3) We may or may not later decided to abandon the unversioned URIs, and if we can figure out how, redirect them, but wouldn't want to do that just yet because of the pointers to that. All this should be easy enough to keep up to date with commit hooks specific to each branch, if we can ever figure out the one thing blocking that from happening (enabling Travis-CI to push what it generates to the repository). Michael On 12/04/2016 1:57 PM, Joseph Scheuhammer wrote: > On 2016-04-12 11:24 AM, Joanmarie Diggs wrote: >> What say y'all? > Another thought, or, rather, some questions: Currently we use github.io > (gh-pages) for snapshots of the editors' drafts. Right now they are > snapshots of master. Given what you propose, master will the editors' > drafts of ARIA 2.0, suggesting that the snapshots will be of 2.0 > features. Where can we save snapshots of the 1.1 documents (is it even > possible)? Or, do we give up on snapshots for 1.1? Or do we use > gh-pages for snapshots of 1.1 until it is released, and forgo snapshots > of 2.0? >
Received on Tuesday, 12 April 2016 20:11:10 UTC