Re: Vertical Temperature Slider

Hi folks,

I’ve fixed the negative assertions so that they’re marked as passing for test 1, but I’ve confirmed again this morning that the other tests (test 2, test 9) are already marked as “untestable”.

I’ve also noticed a strange behavior; when nothing has been selected for the radio buttons and then “untestable” is checked the radio buttons are then checked (seemingly defaults to “No”, which would indicate a failed assertion).

Between that behavior, and re-reviewing the conflicts, it seems like Dean may have marked some of the assertions as passing before then marking the test as “untestable”.

Thanks!

Murray M. Moss (they/them) | Accessibility Dev Lead
Curriculum Associates<http://www.curriculumassociates.com/> | MMoss@cainc.com<mailto:MMoss@cainc.com>


From: Isabel Del castillo <isa.delcastillo5@gmail.com>
Date: Friday, August 8, 2025 at 9:05 AM
To: public-aria-at@w3.org <public-aria-at@w3.org>
Subject: [EXTERNAL] Re: Vertical Temperature Slider

Hello all,

Thank you, Dean.

I've reviewed the conflicts. It looks like you both need to change the following commands to "untestable":

  *   For test 2: Shift+J
  *   For test 9: End

Also, for test 1, Murray needs to verify that the negative assertions pass.

Have a great weekend,

Isa


On 07/08/2025 22:27, Dean Hamack wrote:

Folks,

Went back through vertical temperature slider. Looks like I had forgot to submit a couple results.

There are a few conflicts, but the output and results were the same for both of us, so I think this is a case of not reading the assertion correctly (eg: must not versus must). If someone else wants to take a look, that would be great.

I’ll take a look at the accordion again tomorrow and send out an email with the exact steps I took where I encountered the issue with the autofill feature kicking in on the text inputs so we can make a decision on how to handle that next week.

Dean Hamack, CPWA
AXXS
Phone: (629) 888-7069
Email: dean@axxs.io<mailto:dean@axxs.io>