Re: ARIA-AT Test Plan Feedback

Thanks, Alyssa and Hadi, for submitting this feedback.  The layout of the radio buttons in their table is indeed confusing, and I'm hopeful that a resolution plan will be discussed and formed soon.

Regards,

James Scholes
Director of Digital Accessibility, Prime Access Consulting, Inc.

On 22/09/2021 at 4:34 pm, Alyssa Vo wrote:
> Hi everyone,
> 
>  
> 
> Hadi and I went through the first testing task for the JAWS/Chrome disclosure-navigation test plan and noticed a couple of issues.
> 
>  1. In the assertion evaluation tables under the Record Results section, radio buttons are in two radio groups. When browsing with JAWS, we noticed that the “Good Output” button is announced as “1 of 1” while the “No Output” and “Incorrect Output” radio buttons are announced as “1 of 2” and “2 of 2”. These radio buttons are correctly associated with their labels, but are not grouped together into one larger radio group. We think that each button should be announced as “1 of 3”, “2 of 3”, and so on.
>  2. The label of “Were there additional undesirable behaviors?” is not associated with its corresponding radio group. When tabbing to the “No, there were no additional undesirable behaviors” radio button, the preceding question is not announced as a radio group label. From looking at the code, it appears that there is a fieldset. However, there is no corresponding legend tag wrapped around “Were there additional undesirable behaviors?”.
> 
>  
> 
> If anyone has any additional questions about our feedback, please let me know. We’d be happy to demo our experience or elaborate more.
> 
>  
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Alyssa
> 
>  
> 
> Alyssa Vo
> 
> /She/her/hers/
> 
> Student Accessibility Assistant, UW-IT
> 
> 425-633-0845
> 
> _avo4@uw.edu <mailto:avo4@uw.edu>_
> 
>  
>

Received on Thursday, 23 September 2021 00:46:59 UTC