- From: Michael Fairchild <michael.fairchild@deque.com>
- Date: Wed, 17 Jun 2020 15:19:54 -0500
- To: public-aria-at@w3.org
- Message-ID: <CAMOUeN8rJ73H1fXgtKrnmOwCar-XXUPQs=b-Q99RzmMQNduuOg@mail.gmail.com>
Minutes of the meeting are attached. The minute URL was not working. [14:24] <Matt_King> zakim, take up item 1 [14:24] <Zakim> agendum 1. "Schedule" taken up [from michael_fairchild] [14:25] <michael_fairchild> Matt_King: I need to catch up on some other projects, so I'm going on a meeting diet for the next few months. [14:26] <michael_fairchild> Matt_King: I'd like to suggest that we have a lighter meeting schedule over the next few week. And I'd like to stagger my W3C meetings for the next few months. [14:27] <michael_fairchild> Matt_King: are others open to taking a break in the meeting schedule for a bit? [14:27] <michael_fairchild> rob_fentress: I'll be on vacation for the next few weeks. [14:27] <michael_fairchild> michael_fairchild: I'm okay with taking a break [14:28] <rob_fentress> Next 2 weeks. I'll be back the week of the 5th [14:28] <michael_fairchild> Matt_King: I know Michael had a concern that we have a lot of momentum right now, and you don't want to lose that momentum [14:29] <michael_fairchild> Matt_King: I'm not very concerned about losing steam at the moment as long as people come back energized with more time on their plate [14:29] <michael_fairchild> Matt_King: I don't have a specific proposal, other than skipping some meetings. I don't want to move the meeting time. [14:30] <michael_fairchild> Matt_King: does this time still work for everyone? [14:30] <michael_fairchild> (no response) [14:30] <michael_fairchild> Matt_King: sounds like it isn't a problem, at least for the folks that are here [14:31] <michael_fairchild> Matt_King: I'd like to schedule a meeting for June 30th and July 14th. [14:31] <michael_fairchild> Matt_King: and July 28th [14:32] <michael_fairchild> Matt_King: correction, July 1, 15, and 29 [14:32] <michael_fairchild> michael_fairchild: sounds good [14:32] <michael_fairchild> rob_fentress: I'm okay with that [14:33] <michael_fairchild> Zakim, take up item 2 [14:33] <Zakim> agendum 2. "Resolving test conflicts and publishing draft results" taken up [from michael_fairchild] [14:34] <michael_fairchild> Matt_King: there is only one draft report published at the moment due to test conflicts and incomplete tests [14:35] <michael_fairchild> Matt_King: priorities: publish draft reports, resolve conflicts, and developing additional tests [14:36] <michael_fairchild> Matt_King: another thing that we could do is focus on documentation, especially around writing tests. But we can do that while working on tests [14:36] <michael_fairchild> Matt_King: another area could be engagement with screen reader developers [14:37] <michael_fairchild> Matt_King: I did talk with Bocoup about brining someone on full time to write tests [14:39] <michael_fairchild> Matt_King: are those three priorities where we (the CG) thinks that we can contribute to over the next few months. [14:39] <michael_fairchild> rob_fentress: yes [14:39] <michael_fairchild> michael_fairchild: yes [14:39] <michael_fairchild> Matt_King: Rob, do you feel comfortable writing tests? [14:39] <michael_fairchild> rob_fentress: I'd like to wait a little while [14:40] <michael_fairchild> Matt_King: what are the things that would most help you get there? [14:40] <michael_fairchild> rob_fentress: to be honest, I'm not sure what is there already (in terms of documentation) [14:40] <michael_fairchild> Matt_King: I think the mechanics part of that is fairly simple. It's just a CSV. [14:41] <michael_fairchild> Matt_King: the part that I wonder the most about is coming up with the assertions and instructions [14:41] <michael_fairchild> rob_fentress: I could maybe start with the button example [14:41] <michael_fairchild> rob_fentress: what's the timeline? [14:42] <michael_fairchild> Matt_King: we haven't discussed that yet, but we will work on that in the next meeting [14:42] <michael_fairchild> Zakim, take up item 3 [14:42] <Zakim> agendum 3. "Updating tests based on feedback and new test development" taken up [from michael_fairchild] [14:43] <michael_fairchild> Matt_King: Simon labelled all of the issues on Github. [14:45] <michael_fairchild> Matt_King: I'll put a link to Github with the correct filter [14:47] <michael_fairchild> is this it? https://github.com/w3c/aria-at/issues?q=is%3Aopen+is%3Aissue+label%3Atests [14:47] <michael_fairchild> This is the correct filter https://github.com/w3c/aria-at/issues?q=is%3Aopen+is%3Aissue+label%3Atests+label%3Abug [14:48] <michael_fairchild> Matt_King: these are problems with the test content [14:48] == Joe_Humbert [~Joe_Humbert@ef89345d.public.cloak] has quit ["Page closed"] [14:48] <michael_fairchild> Matt_King: for these, we want PRs, probably one pull request per pattern [14:48] <michael_fairchild> rob_fentress: as far as pull requests, are you usually doing it from other forks? [14:49] <michael_fairchild> Matt_King: it's a little easier to collaborate if it is a branch and not a fork [14:49] <michael_fairchild> Matt_King: this could be another place to start, Rob, if you were interested in helping [14:50] <michael_fairchild> rob_fentress: that might be a good idea [14:50] <michael_fairchild> Matt_King: There are only 3 files that you would modify [14:51] <michael_fairchild> michael_fairchild: feel free to ping me if you have any questions [14:51] <michael_fairchild> rob_fentress: I'll take checkbox [14:52] <michael_fairchild> Matt_King: I'll take menubar [14:52] <michael_fairchild> Zakim, take up item 4 [14:52] <Zakim> agendum 4. "Normalizing keys.mjs" taken up [from michael_fairchild] [14:52] <michael_fairchild> Zakim, take up item 2 [14:52] <Zakim> agendum 2. "Resolving test conflicts and publishing draft results" taken up [from michael_fairchild] [14:53] <michael_fairchild> Matt_King: we have a bunch of tests with conflicts [14:54] == zcorpan [~zcorpan@ef89345d.public.cloak] has joined #aria-at [14:54] == Heron [~Heron@ef89345d.public.cloak] has joined #aria-at [14:55] <michael_fairchild> Matt_King: the way that the process was intended to work, was the test testers could find the conflicts in the runner [14:55] <michael_fairchild> rob_fentress: how do you find the conflicts? [14:56] <michael_fairchild> Matt_King: go to the test runner, open the pilot test cycle, and under the status column it says something like "in progress with 10 conflicting tests" [14:56] <michael_fairchild> Matt_King: on the test queue page [14:58] <michael_fairchild> rob_fentress: I don't see it [14:58] <michael_fairchild> Matt_King: oh, because I didn't check Jaws under settings [14:59] <michael_fairchild> Matt_King: we can walk through this in the next meeting and discuss the conflict resolution. We want all of the testers to agree on the fix *Michael Fairchild, *CPWA <https://www.accessibilityassociation.org/cpwacertification> *•* *Senior **Accessibility Consultant* Deque Systems <https://deque.com> On Mon, Jun 15, 2020 at 8:52 AM Michael Fairchild < michael.fairchild@deque.com> wrote: > Hello everyone, > > Please join us for our call this Wednesday, 2020-06-17. > > We will set the agenda at the start of the meeting using issues with the > "Agenda+" label > <https://github.com/w3c/aria-at/issues?q=is%3Aissue+is%3Aopen+label%3AAgenda%2B> > in Github. > > Meeting details: > > - > > When: every Wednesday for 1 hour > - > > 12:00 pm Pacific (San Francisco) > - > > 2:00 pm Central Time (Chicago) > - > > 3:00 pm Eastern Time (New York) > - > > Where: BlueJeans call (details follow) with IRC > > BlueJeans meeting info: You can dial in or connect via web or BlueJeans > app. > > To join the meeting on a computer or mobile phone: > > - Join Meeting from Computer: https://bluejeans.com/678068494 > - One-Touch: +14087407256,,,,678068494#,,# > <+14087407256,,,,678068494#,,%23> > - Meeting ID: 678068494 > > To join via phone: > > 1. Dial: +1-408-740-7256 > 2. Enter Conference ID: 678068494# > > Want to test your video connection? https://bluejeans.com/111 > > > > IRC: > > > - Using a client: irc://irc.w3.org:6667/#aria-at > - Browser: http://irc.w3.org/?channels=aria-at > > As always, please let me know if you have any questions. > > *Michael Fairchild, *CPWA > <https://www.accessibilityassociation.org/cpwacertification> *•* *Senior **Accessibility > Consultant* > > Deque Systems <https://deque.com> >
Received on Wednesday, 17 June 2020 20:20:20 UTC