Re: 5-Day CfC: Accept draft charter in 2018-10-26 form

+1

On Mon, Oct 29, 2018 at 7:08 AM Gunderson, Jon R <jongund@illinois.edu>
wrote:

> +1
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Joanmarie Diggs <jdiggs@igalia.com>
> Sent: Friday, October 26, 2018 2:23 PM
> To: ARIA Admin <public-aria-admin@w3.org>
> Subject: 5-Day CfC: Accept draft charter in 2018-10-26 form
>
> This is a Call for Consensus (CfC) to the ARIA Working Group on the
> question of accepting the revised draft charter (as written on 2018-10-26).
> That revision can be found at
> https://rawgit.com/w3c/aria/charter/charter/index.html.
>
> Background
>
> The ARIA Working Group's proposed charter, found at
> https://www.w3.org/2018/03/draft-aria-charter, was presented to the
> Advisory Committee for review and approval in July. The results of that
> review were:
>
> * 35: supports this Charter as is
> * 1: abstains from this review
> * 2: suggests changes to this Charter, and only supports the proposal if
>   the changes are adopted [Formal Objection]
>
> We subsequently worked with the W3C management and the two organizations
> suggesting changes in an attempt to resolve the concerns raised, the bulk
> of which were related to the Success Criteria section of our proposed
> charter. The result of that work is the rewritten success criteria
> statement found here:
> https://rawgit.com/w3c/aria/charter/charter/index.html#success-criteria.
>
> This rewritten statement was reviewed by the members of the ARIA Working
> Group present at today's TPAC meeting (minutes:
> https://www.w3.org/2018/10/26-aria-minutes.html#item04). The resolution
> (found here:
> https://www.w3.org/2018/10/26-aria-minutes.html#resolution02) is to
> "Accept draft charter in 2018-10-26 form, send CfC to confirm during AC
> final check".
>
> For convenience, here is the new success criteria statement:
>
>     For the ARIA specifications, implementability and interoperability
>     of every feature will be demonstrated by having at least two
>     independent browser implementations of that feature. In addition,
>     for the Accessibility API Mapping specification(s), each ARIA
>     feature will be shown to have at least one implementation in each
>     of: ATK/AT-SPI2, MSAA+IAccessible2, AXAPI, and UIAutomation.
>
>     Every effort will be made to take member organizations' schedules
>     into account and to ensure all platforms are included. If needed,
>     an Accessibility API Mapping specification will be split into
>     platform-specific specifications, e.g. one for ATK/AT-SPI2, one for
>     MSAA+IAccessible2, one for AXAPI, and one for UIAutomation. This
>     will allow each platform's specification to progress along the Rec
>     track at the timeline that best suits them. For specifications which
>     are not split apart in this fashion, no platform will be dropped out
>     of the specification without prior consultation with that platform's
>     owners.
>
> We believe that this new language ensures that we do not relax the
> requirements the W3C and its member organizations expect of Working Groups,
> that we do include all platforms in our specifications, and that we can
> still progress along the Rec track in a relatively timely fashion. We hope
> that the members of the Advisory Committee will agree.
> In the meantime, as per the resolution from today's meeting, we would like
> your input on this CfC.
>
> Action
>
> This CfC is now open for objection, comment, as well as statements of35
> support via email. Silence will be interpreted as support, though messages
> of support are certainly welcome.
>
> If you object to this proposal, or have comments concerning it, please
> respond by replying on list to this message no later than 17:00 Boston
> Time, Friday, 2 November 2018.
>
> For objections only, please copy the main public-aria@w3.org list to
> allow technical discussion of the objection to happen there.
>
> Process
>
> This CfC is conducted per the ARIA WG decision policy:
> https://www.w3.org/WAI/ARIA/decision-policy
>
>
>

-- 
Harris Schneiderman
*Deque Systems, Inc.,* Senior Developer
*www.deque.com <http://www.deque.com/>*