Re: 5-Day CfC: Advance Graphics ARIA and Graphics AAM to CR

+1


On 05/03/2018 15:30, Amelia Bellamy-Royds wrote:
> +1
> 
> I have just pushed a few edits to the Graphics ARIA repo, which should 
> be reflected in the Editor's Draft as soon as the Travis build runs.
> 
> The edits don't affect any normative aspects of these specs; they mostly 
> involve cleaning up the examples & ReSpec formatting.  One of the 
> changes closes the only open issue on either spec, about avoiding 
> aria-flowto (https://github.com/w3c/graphics-aria/issues/1 
> <https://github.com/w3c/graphics-aria/issues/1>). I also removed an 
> editor's note about adding a more detailed canvas example, since the 
> canvas hit regions spec has been rolled back.
> 
> See the commit messages for more details: 
> https://github.com/w3c/graphics-aria/commits/master
> 
> The working drafts for both specs were last re-published in January, and 
> there have been no other edits since.
> 
> The "MUST" requirements for both specs are covered by the same Web 
> Platform Test suite 
> (https://github.com/w3c/web-platform-tests/tree/master/graphics-aam 
> <https://github.com/w3c/web-platform-tests/tree/master/graphics-aam>), 
> although Graphics ARIA has additional "SHOULD / SHOULD NOT" requirements 
> for authors and for alternative visual media, which can't easily be 
> tested in an automated way.
> 
> The summary of test results shows multiple passing implementations 
> (most, but not all, thanks to Joanie's own code): 
> http://w3c.github.io/test-results/graphics-aam/ 
> <http://w3c.github.io/test-results/graphics-aam/>
> 
> ~Amelia
> 
> On 5 March 2018 at 04:56, Joanmarie Diggs <jdiggs@igalia.com 
> <mailto:jdiggs@igalia.com>> wrote:
> 
>     This is a Call for Consensus (CfC) to the ARIA Working Group on the
>     question of advancing the following two specifications to Candidate
>     Recommendation:
> 
>     * WAI-ARIA Graphics Module
>     https://www.w3.org/TR/graphics-aria-1.0/
>     <https://www.w3.org/TR/graphics-aria-1.0/>
> 
>     * Graphics Accessibility API Mappings
>     https://www.w3.org/TR/graphics-aam-1.0/
>     <https://www.w3.org/TR/graphics-aam-1.0/>
> 
>     Action
> 
>     This CfC is now open for objection, comment, as well as statements of
>     support via email. Silence will be interpreted as support, though
>     messages of support are certainly welcome.
> 
>     If you object to this proposal, or have comments concerning it, please
>     respond by replying on list to this message no later than 17:00 Boston
>     Time, Friday, 9 March 2018.
> 
>     For objections only, please copy the main public-aria@w3.org
>     <mailto:public-aria@w3.org> list to
>     allow technical discussion of the objection to happen there.
> 
>     Process
> 
>     This CfC is conducted per the ARIA WG decision policy:
>     https://www.w3.org/WAI/ARIA/decision-policy
>     <https://www.w3.org/WAI/ARIA/decision-policy>
> 
> 
> 

-- 
@LeonieWatson @tink@toot.cafe Carpe diem

Received on Monday, 5 March 2018 23:12:26 UTC