- From: Joanmarie Diggs <jdiggs@igalia.com>
- Date: Thu, 7 Sep 2017 16:25:05 -0400
- To: James Craig <jcraig@apple.com>
- Cc: ARIA Admin <public-aria-admin@w3.org>, "David (Standards) Singer" <singer@apple.com>
Hey James. As I commented in the github issue, those are essentially notes/flags for us; not text to be included in the TR (or even the PR) version. --joanie On 09/07/2017 04:04 PM, James Craig wrote: > + 1 to ship Core-AAM 1.1 as-is or with the non-normative changes > captured in Issue-645 https://github.com/w3c/aria/issues/645 > > As mentioned previously, all AAM documents should move to a “Living > Standard” at the earliest opportunity. As each platform’s API changes > are tied to entirely different release cycles, it does not make sense > for any of the AAM docs to continue down the Rec Track path. > > Thanks, > James > > >> On Sep 7, 2017, at 11:05 AM, Joanmarie Diggs <jdiggs@igalia.com >> <mailto:jdiggs@igalia.com>> wrote: >> >> This is a Call for Consensus (CfC) to the ARIA Working Group on the >> question of advancing the "Core Accessibility API Mappings 1.1" (Core >> AAM) to Candidate Recommendation. The specification can be found here: >> https://rawgit.com/w3c/aria/master/core-aam/core-aam.html >> >> Action >> >> This CfC is now open for objection, comment, as well as statements of >> support via email. Silence will be interpreted as support, though >> messages of support are certainly welcome. >> >> If you object to this proposal, or have comments concerning it, please >> respond by replying on list to this message no later than 14:00 Boston >> Time, Tuesday, 12 September 2017. >> >> For objections only, please copy the main public-aria@w3.org list to >> allow technical discussion of the objection to happen there. >> >> Process >> >> This CfC is conducted per the ARIA WG decision policy: >> https://www.w3.org/WAI/ARIA/decision-policy >> > > James Craig • Accessibility Design & Quality • jcraig@apple.com > <mailto:jcraig@apple.com> >
Received on Thursday, 7 September 2017 20:26:03 UTC