- From: W3C Community Development Team <team-community-process@w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 9 Nov 2016 18:02:06 +0000
- To: public-argumentation@w3.org
Introduction Automated reasoning is a branch of artificial intelligence dedicated to understanding different aspects of reasoning; moral reasoning is reasoning concerned with morality. Automated moral reasoning is a research topic pertaining to the understanding of and the modeling and simulation of moral reasoning. Moral Reasoning Systems and Education Four varieties of moral reasoning systems with educational applications to consider are indicated. Firstly, there is a variety of moral reasoning system with console-based or text-based user interfaces, a variety which possibly makes use of custom programming languages. This variety requires some specialized expertise to use, resembling, perhaps, computer algebra systems, automated theorem provers and proof assistants. Secondly, there is a variety of moral reasoning system with natural language and multimodal user interfaces. This variety includes dialog systems, virtual humans, intelligent personal assistants and intelligent tutoring systems. This variety can conveniently answer, discuss and advise a larger number of users with regard to questions which they might ask, including in educational contexts. Thirdly, there is a variety of moral reasoning system which interoperates with the processing and generation of stories, fables, parables or exemplums. This variety can be of use in processing the moral messages of literary texts and generating literary texts which teach moral messages. Fourthly, there is a variety of moral reasoning system which interoperates with interactive simulations and interactive digital entertainment. This variety interoperates with drama managers, experience managers, virtual interactive storytellers, virtual directors, and other educational narrative technologies. Automated Moral Reasoning and Planning Automated planning and scheduling is a branch of artificial intelligence concerned with the realization of strategies or action sequences. Moral reasoning components should be interoperable with planning and scheduling components. Planning is often instrumental to the resultant behavior of intelligent systems and robotics. Machine ethics, or computational ethics, is a part of the ethics of artificial intelligence concerned with the moral behavior of artificially intelligent systems. Uses of planning are much broader than robotics. Uses of planning extend into every sector, into industry, academia, science, military and government, and into public policy. Combinations of planners and moral reasoning can provide societal benefits transcending robotics and machine ethics. Conclusion Moral reasoning systems can provide broad societal benefits including computer-aided moral reasoning, computer-aided authoring of literature, new tools for the digital humanities, new decision support and public policy technologies, and new tools for education. References Barber, H., and D. Kudenko. "A User Model for the Dynamic Generation of Dilemma-based Interactive Narratives." In AIIDE Workshop on Optimizing Player Satisfaction. 2007. Goldin, Ilya M., Kevin D. Ashley, and Rosa L. Pinkus. "Introducing PETE: computer support for teaching ethics." In Proceedings of the 8th international conference on Artificial intelligence and law, pp. 94-98. ACM, 2001. Hodhod, Rania. "Interactive Narrative and Intelligent Tutoring for Ill-Defined Domains." (2008). Hodhod, Rania, Daniel Kudenko, and Paul Cairns. "AEINS: Adaptive Educational Interactive Narrative System to Teach Ethics." In AIED 2009: 14 th International Conference on Artificial Intelligence in Education Workshops Proceedings, p. 79. 2009. Hodhod, Rania, Daniel Kudenko, and Paul Cairns. "Serious Games to Teach Ethics." AISB'09: Artificial and Ambient Intelligence (2009). McLaren, Bruce M. "Extensionally defining principles and cases in ethics: An AI model." Artificial Intelligence 150, no. 1 (2003): 145-181. McLaren, Bruce M. "Computational models of ethical reasoning: Challenges, initial steps, and future directions." IEEE intelligent systems 21, no. 4 (2006): 29-37. Prakken, Henry, and Giovanni Sartor. "Law and logic: a review from an argumentation perspective." Artificial intelligence 227 (2015): 214-245. Saptawijaya, Ari, and LuĂs Moniz Pereira. "Towards modeling morality computationally with logic programming." In International Symposium on Practical Aspects of Declarative Languages, pp. 104-119. Springer International Publishing, 2014. Schrier, Karen. "EPIC: a framework for using video games in ethics education." Journal of Moral Education 44, no. 4 (2015): 393-424. Sharipova, Mayya, and Gordon McCalla. "Supporting Students’ Interactions over Case Studies." In International Conference on Artificial Intelligence in Education, pp. 772-775. Springer International Publishing, 2015. Vitz, Paul C. "The use of stories in moral development: New psychological reasons for an old education method." American Psychologist 45, no. 6 (1990): 709. ---------- This post sent on Argumentation Community Group 'Moral Reasoning Systems' https://www.w3.org/community/argumentation/2016/11/09/moral-reasoning-systems/ Learn more about the Argumentation Community Group: https://www.w3.org/community/argumentation
Received on Wednesday, 9 November 2016 18:02:12 UTC