- From: W3C Community Development Team <team-community-process@w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 2 Apr 2015 17:08:51 +0000
- To: public-argumentation@w3.org
Documents can align XML, tree-based, document content with graph-based semantics, RDF semantics. Use case scenarios include: argumentation formats, linguistic and semantic annotations, rhetorical structure, SSML and XHTML documents. In SSML contexts, such data can facilitate enhanced prosodic speech synthesis. In XHTML scenarios, many new features are possible. Documents can interface as both trees and graphs. A solution for document and modular document component semantics is extending document object model interfaces. Document object model elements such as Element, HTMLElement, HTMLObjectElement as well as custom elements could be extended with a semantics attribute which returns at least a graph interface. Topics include accessing: (1) the semantics of an element, (2) the semantics of an element and of its descendant nodes, (3) a graph from an element and an XPath expression. The interface of Document could be similarly extended, document.semantics. The contents of such graphs could be: From content regions in a document as per: ... or .... Linked to from a document as per: , or . A @rel attribute could vary processing or map graphs to resultant graphs; or could map graph data to or from an annotation ontology. Document semantics interfaces could reference package semantics metadata, as described in OpenDocument 1.2, Part 3: Packages, Chapter 6: Metadata Manifest. Inferred from or processed from other document content including: document markup semantics, structural semantics, attributes such as @xhtml:role, @rdf:type, @rdfa:typeof or @epub:type, microformats and RDFa. Web components could include a means of specifying such semantics in addition to structure, styling and scripting. Enhanced features include semantic reasoning upon graph-based data and the Web-based and desktop-based indexing, search and retrieval of such data and metadata, the data and metadata of document packages, documents, document components and multimedia. Furthermore, by expanding document object models to include document semantics, implementations of semantic selectors, e.g. SPARQL, can be facilitated. https://www.w3.org/2003/03/rdf-in-xml.html https://www.w3.org/TR/rdf-interfaces/ https://www.w3.org/TR/rdf-interfaces/#graphs https://www.w3.org/TR/rdf-api/ https://www.w3.org/TR/rdfa-syntax/ http://infomesh.net/2002/rdfinhtml/ https://www.w3.org/community/rdfjs/ ---------- This post sent on Argumentation Community Group 'XML/RDF Hybrid Documents' https://www.w3.org/community/argumentation/2015/04/02/xmlrdf-hybrid-documents/ Learn more about the Argumentation Community Group: https://www.w3.org/community/argumentation
Received on Thursday, 2 April 2015 17:08:53 UTC