- From: Tom Breton (Tehom) <tehom@panix.com>
- Date: Tue, 28 May 2013 23:16:53 -0400
- To: public-argumentation@w3.org
I have started Argument Representation Community Group, which I invite interested parties to support: http://www.w3.org/community/blog/2013/05/29/proposed-group-argument-representation-community-group/ http://www.w3.org/community/groups/proposed/#argmntreprsnt What's different: Narrow focus on the topic of formally representing argument. It is not intended to augment XML in any other way. Why: Adam and I disagree on what topics are within this group's scope. I felt strongly that it ought to focus as directed by its mission statement. After a recent email from Adam, I no longer believe our differing views can be reconciled. I have no wish to distress Adam or cause conflict with him. I don't think that butting heads over our differing views is fruitful. The Community Development Lead suggested this split as one possible solution, and after mulling it over, I agreed. Everyone is invited. I promise that Argument Representation will stay on its topic. Tom Breton (Tehom)
Received on Wednesday, 29 May 2013 03:17:14 UTC