W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-argumentation@w3.org > May 2013

Argument Representation Community Group proposed

From: Tom Breton (Tehom) <tehom@panix.com>
Date: Tue, 28 May 2013 23:16:53 -0400
Message-ID: <b9ee651cb3460e3bde64f0b8cf11a235.squirrel@mail.panix.com>
To: public-argumentation@w3.org
I have started Argument Representation Community Group, which I invite
interested parties to support:


What's different: Narrow focus on the topic of formally representing
argument.  It is not intended to augment XML in any other way.

Why: Adam and I disagree on what topics are within this group's scope.  I
felt strongly that it ought to focus as directed by its mission statement.
 After a recent email from Adam, I no longer believe our differing views
can be reconciled.

I have no wish to distress Adam or cause conflict with him.  I don't think
that butting heads over our differing views is fruitful.  The Community
Development Lead suggested this split as one possible solution, and after
mulling it over, I agreed.

Everyone is invited.  I promise that Argument Representation will stay on
its topic.

	Tom Breton (Tehom)
Received on Wednesday, 29 May 2013 03:17:14 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 18:57:21 UTC