- From: Adam Sobieski <adamsobieski@hotmail.com>
- Date: Fri, 14 Jun 2013 19:16:52 +0000
- To: Guillermo Simari <grsimari@gmail.com>
- CC: "public-argumentation@w3.org" <public-argumentation@w3.org>
Received on Friday, 14 June 2013 19:17:20 UTC
http://www.w3.org/community/argumentation/wiki/Main_Page#Argumentation_Formats > To: public-argumentation@w3.org > Date: Thu, 13 Jun 2013 09:58:12 +0000 > From: grsimari@gmail.com > Subject: Towards an argument interchange format, a proposal. [via Argumentation Community Group] > > Towards an Argument Interchange Format Carlos I. Chesñevar, Jarred > McGinnis, Sanjay Modgil, Iyad Rahwan, Chris Reed, Guillermo > R. Simari, Matthew South, Gerard Vreeswijk, Steven Willmott. The Knowledge > Engineering Review. Volume 21, Number 4, December 2006. pp. 293-316 > (see http://journals.cambridge.org/action/displayAbstract?fromPage=online&aid=561512&fulltextType=RE&fileId=S0269888906001044) > Abstract The theory of argumentation is a rich, interdisciplinary area of > research straddling the fields of artificial intelligence, philosophy, > communication studies, linguistics and psychology. In the last few years, > significant progress has [...] > > > > ---------- > > This post sent on Argumentation Community Group > > > > 'Towards an argument interchange format, a proposal.' > > http://www.w3.org/community/argumentation/2013/06/13/towards-an-argument-interchange-format-a-proposal/ > > > > Learn more about the Argumentation Community Group: > > http://www.w3.org/community/argumentation > > > >
Received on Friday, 14 June 2013 19:17:20 UTC