- From: Adam Sobieski <adamsobieski@hotmail.com>
- Date: Thu, 25 Apr 2013 18:01:22 +0000
- To: "public-argumentation@w3.org" <public-argumentation@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <SNT138-W60C13081DB933CA869267C5B60@phx.gbl>
Argumentation Community Group
Greetings. There
was a typo; the examples of the XSLT-enhanced XML include format,
indicated for discussion and specification, are:
<include xmlns="{1}" href="example.xslt" src="optional.xml" select="optional XSLT expression">
<{2} name="..." value="..." as="optional:type" />
<{2} name="..." as="optional:type">
<!-- xml -->
</{2}>
</include>
<include xmlns="{1}" href="an_argument.xslt">
<{3} select="XPath to supporting arguments" method="append">
<include href="another_argument.xslt"/>
</{3}>
</include>
<include xmlns="{1}" href="an_argument.xslt">
<{3} select="XPath to supporting arguments" method="append">
<macro:example macro:parameter="value"/>
</{3}>
</include>
Also,
as interesting, there's a new wiki page on the Argumentation Community
Group website: http://www.w3.org/community/argumentation/wiki/Technical_Discussion_Topics
which we can expand and add detail to during the current phase pertains to a
few requisite specifications en route to a new argumentation
format as well as preliminary discussion of the concepts and expressiveness of such a new format.
Kind regards,
Adam Sobieski
Received on Thursday, 25 April 2013 18:01:49 UTC