- From: Adam Sobieski <adamsobieski@hotmail.com>
- Date: Thu, 25 Apr 2013 18:01:22 +0000
- To: "public-argumentation@w3.org" <public-argumentation@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <SNT138-W60C13081DB933CA869267C5B60@phx.gbl>
Argumentation Community Group Greetings. There was a typo; the examples of the XSLT-enhanced XML include format, indicated for discussion and specification, are: <include xmlns="{1}" href="example.xslt" src="optional.xml" select="optional XSLT expression"> <{2} name="..." value="..." as="optional:type" /> <{2} name="..." as="optional:type"> <!-- xml --> </{2}> </include> <include xmlns="{1}" href="an_argument.xslt"> <{3} select="XPath to supporting arguments" method="append"> <include href="another_argument.xslt"/> </{3}> </include> <include xmlns="{1}" href="an_argument.xslt"> <{3} select="XPath to supporting arguments" method="append"> <macro:example macro:parameter="value"/> </{3}> </include> Also, as interesting, there's a new wiki page on the Argumentation Community Group website: http://www.w3.org/community/argumentation/wiki/Technical_Discussion_Topics which we can expand and add detail to during the current phase pertains to a few requisite specifications en route to a new argumentation format as well as preliminary discussion of the concepts and expressiveness of such a new format. Kind regards, Adam Sobieski
Received on Thursday, 25 April 2013 18:01:49 UTC