- From: Mark Chipman <markchipman@gmail.com>
- Date: Wed, 28 Mar 2018 18:10:35 -0600
- To: public-architypes@w3.org
- Message-ID: <CAKEHajV_oW2os_gJskV_mcTtzEnoJ2QSX7Sh4qjsPcb-Q-droQ@mail.gmail.com>
I'm a new member of the working group. I joined this group as I'm working on solutions for Alzheimers disease and seeking to address the needs for providing useful memory queues to help with coping. The data represented in this regard, would serve to rekindle memories (IE provide a way to help associate and remember events, facts, images, recordings, etc) for Alzheimers sufferers. The ultimate goal would be provide a means to catalog any kind of digital data as cursory steps to the development of all sorts of technologies and memory aid solutions that could be developed; provided that archives of digital assets could yield such information in a searchable semantic way. So simply, I would like to develop a way to offer schema.org friendly digital assets stored in repositories on the web. All of the content needs to be crawl-able and index-able. I have had a chance to review the proposals presented to date. I do like the second proposal as it lends nicely to adoption into the schema.org graph. After reading the proposals, its seems clear that the requirements for digital assets have not been addressed as far as I can tell in regards to: - Digital Access Rights (authentication and authorization)... basically the same requirements necessary for access permission of web resources for securing any other type of content... think acess tokens (OAuth, SAML, or OpenID) as well as claims to control access. - authority - the establishment of the archived content's nature as authoritative (content owners/official record bearer repositories) versus unauthoritative (available collections that serve as alternate repositories of the same content) - related content archives - collection of one or more other locations of similar or related content - trustworthiness (the accuracy of the content) - perhaps where the content originally came from - urls - collection of one or more locations of the online repos (CDNs) - tags - useful keyword identifiers that would promote filtering abilities and allow data ETL into searchable data stores These are just some initial thoughts, but I would like to bring them up for discussion. Perhaps the architypes schema may not be the best fit for this kind of need... but it appears to be the most closely matched in terms of relevance. I appreciate all feedback. Regards, Mark Chipman
Received on Thursday, 29 March 2018 00:11:58 UTC