W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-architypes@w3.org > July 2017

Re: Tweaks to the Archives proposal [via Schema Architypes Community Group]

From: Jane Stevenson <Jane.Stevenson@jisc.ac.uk>
Date: Mon, 3 Jul 2017 06:48:04 +0000
To: public-architypes <public-architypes@w3.org>
Message-ID: <F84B24F8-A7E7-44B8-A818-8442BEEB8D46@jisc.ac.uk>
Hi Richard and everyone, 

If I decided to only use #archiveCollection for all of the units of description, would that work?  We don’t necessarily know if units described are single items or more than one item anyway, and it seems to me we can effectively describe each unit with the properties now provided, which is the main thing. So my question is, why would I need to use #archiveItem? 

Just one more question…. we have properties archiveHeld and holdingArchive, and we also have itemLocation. How is itemLocation different from holdingArchive? In the example, for Ronnie Barker, itemLocation is given as the V&A Theatre & Performance Archive (URL). But surely the property of holdingArchive would do just as well. 

cheers
Jane

Jane Stevenson
Archives Hub Service Manager
jane.stevenson@jisc.ac.uk

Jisc is a registered charity (number 1149740) and a company limited by guarantee which is registered in England under Company No. 5747339, VAT No. GB 197 0632 86. Jisc’s registered office is: One Castlepark, Tower Hill, Bristol, BS2 0JA. T 0203 697 5800.

Jisc Services Limited is a wholly owned Jisc subsidiary and a company limited by guarantee which is registered in England under company number 2881024, VAT number GB 197 0632 86. The registered office is: One Castle Park, Tower Hill, Bristol BS2 0JA. T 0203 697 5800.  
Received on Monday, 3 July 2017 06:48:35 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 8 August 2018 13:29:00 UTC