W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-architypes@w3.org > February 2017

Re: Discussion about previous proposal

From: Owen Stephens <owen@ostephens.com>
Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2017 15:49:49 +0000
Message-Id: <63EB8D41-3528-431D-B082-3B2A742FEB7A@ostephens.com>
Cc: Ed Summers <ehs@pobox.com>, public-architypes <public-architypes@w3.org>
To: Richard Wallis <richard.wallis@dataliberate.com>
Thanks Richard

Apologies - I didn’t follow the original discussion around the proposal, and I understand the original proposal was discussed some time ago. I’m trying to get my head around it now.

I have to admit I’m struggling to see all the parts of the proposal on the wiki

It looks like http://archive.sdo-archive.appspot.com is the best place to understand all the Types, Properties and Enumeration values included in the proposal? Some of these don’t seem to be on the wiki at all or are only mentioned in the example on the wiki page but not defined any further. Am I missing anything on the wiki?


> On 14 Feb 2017, at 15:43, Richard Wallis <richard.wallis@dataliberate.com> wrote:
> Do you have a sense of what these item-level, archive specific properties might be?
> //Ed
> >From the Initial Mode <https://www.w3.org/community/architypes/wiki/Initial_model>l in the Wiki  and represented on http://archive.sdo-archive.appspot.com/ArchivedItem <http://archive.sdo-archive.appspot.com/ArchivedItem>.
> accessAndUse, itemDescription, itemLocation, itemProvenance, itemTransfer  and other Schema properties having ArchivedItem added to their domainIncudes hasPart, isPartOf, http://archive.sdo-archive.appspot.com/ArchivedItem <http://archive.sdo-archive.appspot.com/ArchivedItem>.
Received on Tuesday, 14 February 2017 15:50:24 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 8 August 2018 13:28:59 UTC