Re: Archive as a collection of things

The SAA glossy that Jeff cites probably includes many of the concepts that you'll want to cover, but I would see it as more useful for concept refining than idea harvesting. Its scope is waaaaaaay beyond the sort of data elements and values of interest for this effort.

--Jackie

--
Jackie Dooley
Program Officer, OCLC Research

From: <Young>, Jeff Young <jyoung@oclc.org<mailto:jyoung@oclc.org>>
Date: Friday, 7August, 2015 12:29 PM
To: Richard Wallis <richard.wallis@dataliberate.com<mailto:richard.wallis@dataliberate.com>>, Giovanni Michetti <michetti@mail.ubc.ca<mailto:michetti@mail.ubc.ca>>
Cc: Sarah Romkey <sromkey@artefactual.com<mailto:sromkey@artefactual.com>>, public-architypes <public-architypes@w3.org<mailto:public-architypes@w3.org>>
Subject: RE: Archive as a collection of things
Resent-From: <public-architypes@w3.org<mailto:public-architypes@w3.org>>
Resent-Date: Friday, 7August, 2015 12:29 PM

Here’s a glossary that may help with the idea harvesting:

http://www2.archivists.org/glossary/terms


Also, this diagram illustrating the BNB project is pre-Schema.org, but it helped me wrap my head around key relationships in the bibliographic space.

http://www.bl.uk/bibliographic/pdfs/bldatamodelbook.pdf


Jeff

From: Richard Wallis [mailto:richard.wallis@dataliberate.com]
Sent: Friday, August 07, 2015 2:27 PM
To: Giovanni Michetti
Cc: Young,Jeff (OR); Sarah Romkey; public-architypes
Subject: Re: Archive as a collection of things

Seems that we are moving towards of agreement albeit at differing levels of detail. :-)

I suggest we let the harvesting of thoughts and opinions continue for a while and then see if we have enough to shape up some examples to kick the tyres on.

~Richard