- From: Carl Reed <creed@opengeospatial.org>
- Date: Fri, 4 Jan 2013 08:25:15 -0700
- To: "Christine Perey" <cperey@perey.com>, <wagnerd@qualcomm.com>
- Cc: "Rob Manson" <roBman@mob-labs.com>, <public-ar@w3.org>, <discussion@arstandards.org>
Perhaps Wikipedia is the way to go. Just need to make sure that, as Blair points out, the "fanboys" do not corrupt the content. Cheers Carl -----Original Message----- From: Christine Perey Sent: Friday, January 04, 2013 7:30 AM To: Carl Reed ; wagnerd@qualcomm.com Cc: Rob Manson ; public-ar@w3.org ; discussion@arstandards.org Subject: Re: [AR Standards Discussion] Change of topic - Patents in the AR space Hi, Blair's comment/suggestion to use Wikipedia has a lot of merit. What are the obstacles to doing this? By way of this message I am adding Daniel Wagner (Vuforia) to this interesting thread. Daniel, happy new year! See below a discussion that is on the AR Standards Discussion mailing list. I was wondering to what extent the parties interested could re-use/re-purpose the content on your Mobile AR history page: https://www.icg.tugraz.at/~daniel/HistoryOfMobileAR/ Regards, Christine Spime Wrangler cperey@perey.com @cperey >From Jan 9 to 23, 2013 call +1 (908) 723 5226 Swiss mobile +41 79 436 6869 VoIP +1 (617) 848-8159 Skype Christine_Perey Blog http://www.spimewrangler.com On 1/4/13 12:03 AM, Carl Reed wrote: > Great idea! > > A publicly accessible timeline that individuals can add to with > references, implementations, journal articles and so forth. Any idea of > what toolwe should use? Google Drive or some other easy to use publicly > accessible tool? We could use a public OGC or W3C (or both) twiki. > > Thoughts? > > Thanks > > Carl > > > -----Original Message----- From: Rob Manson > Sent: Thursday, January 03, 2013 3:18 PM > To: public-ar@w3.org ; discussion@arstandards.org > Subject: Re: [AR Standards Discussion] Change of topic - Patents in the AR > space > > Hi Carl, > > I think creating an AR technology timeline that the community could > contribute to over time would be great for this. > > There's been a lot of AR related patents lately that are obviously not > unique or novel in any way. > > This type of timeline would help both applicants and patent offices find > this prior art and at the same time build up a chronology of our history. > > roBman > > > On 04/01/13 02:30, Carl Reed wrote: >> I was searching for examples of the use of OGC standards in AR >> applications. Stumbled on some patents in the web mapping/3d/AR space. >> One example is: >> http://www.faqs.org/patents/app/20100277504 >> Appears Song is getting quite prolific in the AR patent space. >> Anyway, in my mind, there is nothing new or innovative in the patent. >> The GIS community has been doing these types of applications ever since >> the Web was accessible from a smart phone. >> That said, I think perhaps we should think about providing a set of >> possible prior art that folks could use in terms of insuring that any AR >> standards developed by the OGC, W3C, etc remain RAND-RF. >> So, anyone have examples of the type of “invention” detailed in the >> above patent that were publicly available prior to 2010? >> Cheers >> Carl
Received on Friday, 4 January 2013 15:26:16 UTC