- From: ya knygar <knygar@gmail.com>
- Date: Thu, 25 Aug 2011 14:45:33 +0000
- To: W3C AR CG <public-ar@w3.org>
---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: ya knygar <knygar@gmail.com> Date: Thu, Aug 25, 2011 at 2:43 PM Subject: Re: [W3C AR CG] @hollobit about: Re-using the POI's wiki To: internal-ar@w3.org > I think it's good for the general discussion to stay open and public > where possible. Sure, what i mean is - organizational work like a Chairs work such as organizational planning etc. As for this "[W3C AR CG] @hollobit about: Re-using the POI's wiki" topic - it stared a few messages ago - in my talk with Jonathan Jeon about his and POIWG's http://www.w3.org/2010/POI/wiki/AR_Landscape/Draft work To be merged with AR CG's I'd be glad to re-post all the conversation here if You wish and Jonathan Jeon would agree on it. > But if we could do them in bite sized chunks with only > one or two issues per email that would be more productive. +1 let's do it better by " per-topic per-email " ? On Thu, Aug 25, 2011 at 2:09 PM, Rob Manson <roBman@mob-labs.com> wrote: > Hey, > > I think it's good for the general discussion to stay open and public > where possible. But if we could do them in bite sized chunks with only > one or two issues per email that would be more productive. > > > roBman > > > On Thu, 2011-08-25 at 14:04 +0000, ya knygar wrote: >> Hi! >> >> I'll post the further organizational work to the Internal-AR list, >> >> opinions? >> >> > >
Received on Thursday, 25 August 2011 14:46:01 UTC