- From: Marcos Caceres <marcosscaceres@gmail.com>
- Date: Mon, 26 May 2008 15:49:12 +1000
- To: "Dan Brickley" <danbri@danbri.org>
- Cc: www-tag@w3.org, "WAF WG (public)" <public-appformats@w3.org>
> If you really can't live with http: URIs, have you considered using the tag: It's not that we can't live with them, it's that a different scheme might be better suited for this type of application. > URI scheme, see http://www.faqs.org/rfcs/rfc4151.html The Tag URI scheme seems to meet some of the requirements, but seems to have some limitations. We would be required to qualify the semantics of various aspects of the scheme (the specific and fragment parts, for instance) to make it suitable for Widgets. Also, the date resolution of the scheme may be insufficient. I'll need to look at it in more detail. -- Marcos Caceres http://datadriven.com.au
Received on Monday, 26 May 2008 05:49:56 UTC