Re: [widgets] i18n

Yes, the references should be to BCP 47, which is a stable number.

Mark

On Fri, May 2, 2008 at 4:42 AM, David Clarke <w3@dragonthoughts.co.uk>
wrote:

>
> Marcos,
>
> Writing personally - not for I18N core
>
> RFC3066 is referenced frequently - it has been superseded by RFC4646 and
> it would be good idea to update the references in your document.
>
> Marcos Caceres wrote:
>
> > Hi i18n Core,
> > Please disregard the i18n model I proposed in my previous email. We
> > have spec'd out a new model [1] (based on model 2 proposed
> > previously). WAF would still be very interested in hearing your
> > thoughts on what we have come up with and also any thoughts you might
> > have about our configuration document format from an i18n perspective.
> >
> > Kind regards,
> > Marcos
> >
> > [1] http://dev.w3.org/2006/waf/widgets/#localizatio
> >
> ----
> David Clarke
>
>


-- 
Mark