- From: Jonas Sicking <jonas@sicking.cc>
- Date: Tue, 05 Feb 2008 14:52:46 -0800
- To: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@opera.com>
- CC: Arthur Barstow <art.barstow@nokia.com>, "WAF WG (public)" <public-appformats@w3.org>
Anne van Kesteren wrote: > > On Mon, 04 Feb 2008 19:49:51 +0100, Arthur Barstow > <art.barstow@nokia.com> wrote: >> 4. Discussion of "Proposal for a way to avoid a round-trip on every >> POST when dealing with large numbers of URIs" and the subsequent >> follow-ups: >> >> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-appformats/2008Jan/0327.html > > I don't think that discussing this during the teleconference will be > productive use of the WG's time. I'd request everyone to study the draft > text and examples on this matter in > > http://dev.w3.org/2006/waf/access-control/#cross-site1 > > and raise questions on the list as appropriate. If we do want to discuss > this during the teleconference I'd like to hear what the goal of > discussing this during the teleconference is how likely it is that the > discussion will be minuted accurately. I agree with Anne. I think there is a lot more discussion that can happen on the mailing list. I haven't given my input yet, and Neither has Mark Nottingham who was the biggest proponent of something like this. >> 5. Issue #20 (Client and Server model) discussion: > > I have the same problems with this topic. I'd be fine with discussing this though given that we've gotten very little feedback indicating that server-only is desired. So I think we could nail down some stuff here. / Jonas
Received on Tuesday, 5 February 2008 22:54:42 UTC