Wednesday, 30 April 2008
- [widgets] Spec updates
- Initial input for discussion of Widget security model
- Re: IE Team's Proposal for Cross Site Requests
Tuesday, 29 April 2008
- RE: IE Team's Proposal for Cross Site Requests
- RE: [Widgets] platform attribute for versioning
- RE: IE Team's Proposal for Cross Site Requests
Friday, 25 April 2008
- Re: [fwd] [MacOS X] Insecure eval() in Twitgit and Twitterlex dashboard widgets (from: tlr@w3.org)
- Re: [fwd] [MacOS X] Insecure eval() in Twitgit and Twitterlex dashboard widgets (from: tlr@w3.org)
- Re: Cross-Site XHR Detection
- Cross-Site XHR Detection
Thursday, 24 April 2008
- Springer Book on Emergent Web Intelligence: Extended Submission Deadline ...
- [Widgets] platform attribute for versioning
Wednesday, 23 April 2008
- Re: IE Team's Proposal for Cross Site Requests
- Re: IE Team's Proposal for Cross Site Requests
- Re: IE Team's Proposal for Cross Site Requests
- Re: Widgets 1.0: Digital Signature, FPWD comments
- RE: IE Team's Proposal for Cross Site Requests
- CFP: Mashups'08 @ ICSOC
Tuesday, 15 April 2008
- Widgets 1.0: Digital Signature, FPWD comments
- Re: What is Microsoft's intent with XDR vis-à-vis W3C? [Was: Re: IE Team's Proposal for Cross Site Requests]
- [widgets] i18n
- Re: What is Microsoft's intent with XDR vis-à-vis W3C? [Was: Re: IE Team's Proposal for Cross Site =?ISO-8859-1?Q? Requests]?=
Monday, 14 April 2008
- Re: What is Microsoft's intent with XDR vis-à-vis W3C? [Was: Re: IE Team's Proposal for Cross Site Requests]
- Re: What is Microsoft's intent with XDR vis-à-vis W3C? [Was: Re: IE Team's Proposal for Cross Site Requests]
- Cross-domain access in Silverlight 2 Beta 1
- Re: XDR *API* Security Impact
- Re: XDR *API* Security Impact
- Re: XDR *API* Security Impact
- Re: XDR *API* Security Impact
- XDR *API* Security Impact
- Re: What is Microsoft's intent with XDR vis-à-vis W3C? [Was: Re: IE Team's Proposal for Cross Site Requests]
- Re: What is Microsoft's intent with XDR vis-à-vis W3C? [Was: Re: IE Team's Proposal for Cross Site Requests]
- Re: What is Microsoft's intent with XDR vis-à-vis W3C? [Was: Re: IE Team's Proposal for Cross Site Requests]
- RE: What is Microsoft's intent with XDR vis-à-vis W3C? [Was: Re: IE Team's Proposal for Cross Site Requests]
Saturday, 12 April 2008
Friday, 11 April 2008
- Re: [widgets] Digital Signatures
- Access Control Open Issues
- Re: [widgets] Digital Signatures
- Re: [widgets] Digital Signatures
- Re: [widgets] Digital Signatures
Thursday, 10 April 2008
Tuesday, 8 April 2008
- Re: [widgets] Digital Signatures
- Re: [widgets] Digital Signatures
- Re: [widgets] Default icon proposal
- [XMLHttpRequest2] response headers for cross-site requests
- Re: [widgets] Default icon proposal
- Re: [widgets] Digital Signatures
- Re: [widgets] Digital Signatures
- Re: [widgets] Default icon proposal
- Re: Update to Access Control for Cross-site Requests
- Re: Update to Access Control for Cross-site Requests
Monday, 7 April 2008
- Re: Update to Access Control for Cross-site Requests
- [widgets] Authorative reference to CP437
- Re: Update to Access Control for Cross-site Requests
- Re: Update to Access Control for Cross-site Requests
- Re: Update to Access Control for Cross-site Requests
- Re: Update to Access Control for Cross-site Requests
- Re: Update to Access Control for Cross-site Requests
- Update to Access Control for Cross-site Requests
- Re: What is Microsoft's intent with XDR vis-à-vis W3C? [Was: Re: IE Team's Proposal for Cross Site Requests]
- Re: [widgets] Default icon proposal
- Re: [widgets] Request for review for 14th of April
- Re: [widgets] Request for review for 14th of April
- [widgets] Default icon proposal
Sunday, 6 April 2008
Saturday, 5 April 2008
Friday, 4 April 2008
- Re: What is Microsoft's intent with XDR vis-à-vis W3C? [Was: Re: IE Team's Proposal for Cross Site Requests]
- Please, let's stick to Technical Discussions!
- Moving the AC4CSR spec forward [Was: Re: What is Microsoft's intent with XDR vis-a-vis W3C?]
- Re: [widgets] Request for review for 14th of April
- Re: [widgets] Digital Signatures
- RE: [widgets] Digital Signatures
- Re: [widgets] Digital Signatures
- Re: [widgets] Request for review for 14th of April
- Re: [widgets] Request for review for 14th of April
- [widgets-land] Request for approval of FPWD and comments
- [widgets-digsig] Request for approval of FPWD and comments
- [widgets] Request for review for 14th of April
- [widgets-reqs] Request for review for 14th of April
Thursday, 3 April 2008
- RE: [widgets-digsig] Comment on use of X.509 v3
- ISSUE-23 (widget-localization): What is the localization model for widgets? [Widgets]
- [widgets] Minutes from 3 April 2008 Widgets Voice Conference
- Re: What is Microsoft's intent with XDR vis-à-vis W3C? [Was: Re: IE Team's Proposal for Cross Site Requests]
- Re: What is Microsoft's intent with XDR vis-à-vis W3C? [Was: Re: IE Team's Proposal for Cross Site Requests]
- RE: What is Microsoft's intent with XDR vis-à-vis W3C? [Was: Re: IE Team's Proposal for Cross Site Requests]
- RE: What is Microsoft's intent with XDR vis-à-vis W3C? [Was: Re: IE Team's Proposal for Cross Site Requests]
- Re: What is Microsoft's intent with XDR vis-à-vis W3C? [Was: Re: IE Team's Proposal for Cross Site Requests]
- Re: What is Microsoft's intent with XDR vis-à-vis W3C? [Was: Re: IE Team's Proposal for Cross Site Requests]
- Re: [widgets-digsig] Comment on use of X.509 v3
Wednesday, 2 April 2008
- RE: What is Microsoft's intent with XDR vis-à-vis W3C? [Was: Re: IE Team's Proposal for Cross Site Requests]
- RE: [widgets-digsig] Comment on use of X.509 v3
- Re: [widgets-digsig] Comment on use of X.509 v3
- Re: [widgets-digsig] Comment on use of X.509 v3
- Re: [widgets-digsig] Comment on use of X.509 v3
- RE: [widgets-digsig] Comment on use of X.509 v3
- [Widgets] Widget DigSig request for comments
- Re: [Widgets] confi.xml - icon element