- From: Rhys Lewis <rhys@volantis.com>
- Date: Mon, 24 Sep 2007 05:44:31 -0600 (MDT)
- To: "'Arthur Barstow'" <art.barstow@nokia.com>, "'Anne van Kesteren'" <annevk@opera.com>, "'Rhys Lewis'" <Rhys.Lewis@volantis.com>
- Cc: "'WAF WG \(public\)'" <public-appformats@w3.org>
Thanks Art. I'll bring this to the attention of the TAG, for whom my original mail was written. Best wishes Rhys > -----Original Message----- > From: Arthur Barstow [mailto:art.barstow@nokia.com] > Sent: 24 September 2007 12:05 > To: Anne van Kesteren; Rhys Lewis > Cc: WAF WG (public) > Subject: Re: ISSUE-4: AC: does the spec need to differentiate > a resource from a _representation_ of a resource? > > Rhys - regarding your 29 June comments about the WAF WG's > Enabling Read Access for Web Resources document, Anne invites > your input. > Please note the latest Editor's Draft of this spec is available at: > > <http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/2006/waf/access-control/> > > Regards, AB > > On Sep 20, 2007, at 9:26 AM, ext Anne van Kesteren wrote: > > > > > On Fri, 06 Jul 2007 13:56:11 +0200, Web Application Formats Issue > > Tracker <dean+cgi@w3.org> wrote: > >> ISSUE-4: AC: does the spec need to differentiate a resource from a > >> _representation_ of a resource? > >> > >> http://www.w3.org/2005/06/tracker/waf/issues/4 > >> > >> Raised by: Everyone > >> On product: Access Control > >> > >> See: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-tag/2007Jun/0145.html > > > > I have some idea of what they might mean by this, but it > seems like it > > doesn't matter much. Having said that, if someone has a > good reason to > > do this and is willing to suggest new text and monitor the draft to > > make sure we don't do it again I'll make the necessary edits. > > > > > > -- > > Anne van Kesteren > > <http://annevankesteren.nl/> > > <http://www.opera.com/> > > > >
Received on Monday, 24 September 2007 11:44:46 UTC