- From: Marcos Caceres <marcosscaceres@gmail.com>
- Date: Wed, 19 Sep 2007 15:08:55 +1000
- To: "Mark Baker" <distobj@acm.org>
- Cc: "Ian Hickson" <ian@hixie.ch>, "Arve Bersvendsen" <arveb@opera.com>, "Arthur Barstow" <art.barstow@nokia.com>, public-appformats@w3.org
> Stick with etags. They work, and the tooling support is already > pretty good. No need to have a widget-specific mechanism when a > generic one gets the job done. But what if the UA does not have an etag for the resource as it was not acquired over HTTP? For example, you gave me the widget on a CD or sent it to me as an email attachment. Are you saying that the version should be the etag? Eg. config.xml: <widget version="ImReallyAnETagdsfafddsa2" /> I'm not really following.... Kind regards, -- Marcos Caceres http://datadriven.com.au
Received on Wednesday, 19 September 2007 05:09:03 UTC