- From: Cameron McCormack <cam@mcc.id.au>
- Date: Thu, 10 May 2007 09:41:46 +1000
- To: "WAF WG (public)" <public-appformats@w3.org>
Jonas Sicking: > Yes, that is probably how I would interpret the spec now, although it's > not very explicit. This is Option A in my original email. However just > leaving it at that I think would be a severe limitation on what you > could implement using XBL2 since you couldn't keep any private state > while still working with .clone(). You might be able to do it with a UserDataHandler that responds to NODE_CLONED (assuming you have DOM 3 Core). -- Cameron McCormack, http://mcc.id.au/ xmpp:heycam@jabber.org ▪ ICQ 26955922 ▪ MSN cam@mcc.id.au
Received on Wednesday, 9 May 2007 23:41:55 UTC