- From: Grassel Guido (Nokia-NRC/Helsinki) <guido.grassel@nokia.com>
- Date: Wed, 02 May 2007 09:17:22 +0300
- To: ext Marcos Caceres <m.caceres@qut.edu.au>, <bert@w3.org>, "WAF WG (public)" <public-appformats@w3.org>
Marcos, I am fine with this answer. The section could be more detailed by saying that the spec defines a basic set of meta data and leaves users of the spec the option to use their own meta data whenever the provided is insufficient. Regards - Guido On 5/2/07 7:54 AM, "ext Marcos Caceres" <m.caceres@qut.edu.au> wrote: > > This is a response to Bert Bos' review [1] of the Widgets 1.0 > Requirements document [2]. > >> COMMENT 8) Ad "manifest": I was expecting the word "metadata" in this >> paragraph. (Not strictly necessary, just a way to confirm to the reader >> that that is indeed what the definition talks about.) > > The text of section 3.2 has been updated to include the word > "metadata". It now reads: "The manifest language would generally allow > authors to declare metadata and other properties related to their > widget, as well as provide a means to automatically instantiate the > widget" Kind Regards - Guido ----- Guido Grassel, Nokia Research Center, guido.grassel@nokia.com
Received on Wednesday, 2 May 2007 06:16:06 UTC