- From: Marcos Caceres <m.caceres@qut.edu.au>
- Date: Wed, 2 May 2007 14:55:21 +1000
- To: bert@w3.org, "WAF WG (public)" <public-appformats@w3.org>
This is a response to Bert Bos' review [1] of the Widgets 1.0 Requirements document [2]. > Here are the details: > > 1. Introduction > > COMMENT 1) What does "currently" mean in the sentence "the host runtime > environment typically includes APIs that provides [sic] functionality > that is currently specific to widgets"? Are you planning to extend the > requirements to other things than widgets in the next draft? And if so, > to what? "Currently" refers to APIs of the widget engines we investigated in order to put the requirements document together (see Appendix). I have created a new section in the Appendix of the requirements document to more fully discuss the APIs available on current widget engines. This sections is currently empty and I will attempt to fill in the next month or so. For the record, we are not planning to extend the requirements to anything other than widgets. -- Marcos Caceres http://datadriven.com.au [1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-appformats/2007Feb/0131.html [2] http://www.w3.org/TR/2007/WD-widgets-reqs-20070209/
Received on Wednesday, 2 May 2007 04:55:27 UTC