- From: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@opera.com>
- Date: Tue, 31 Jul 2007 17:34:31 +0200
- To: "Jonas Sicking" <jonas@sicking.cc>
- Cc: "Phil Archer" <parcher@icra.org>, "WAF WG (public)" <public-appformats@w3.org>
On Wed, 25 Jul 2007 22:50:05 +0200, Jonas Sicking <jonas@sicking.cc> wrote: > Anne van Kesteren wrote: >> On Mon, 23 Jul 2007 20:29:42 +0200, Jonas Sicking <jonas@sicking.cc> >> wrote: >>>> OK, forget the ? notation. Your examples are very clear and we seem >>>> in full alignment that <foo.com> includes sub domains but <*.foo.com> >>>> wouldn't include foo.com itself. >>> >>> Sounds great. What do other people think of switching to this syntax? >> >> The only slightly confusing thing is that <http://foo.com> also >> matches <http://bar.foo.com> but I suppose that's ok. > > Yeah, I agree, but given all other alternatives I think this is better. Integrated. -- Anne van Kesteren <http://annevankesteren.nl/> <http://www.opera.com/>
Received on Tuesday, 31 July 2007 15:34:47 UTC