- From: Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>
- Date: Sat, 13 Jan 2007 03:05:19 +0000 (UTC)
- To: Cameron McCormack <cam@mcc.id.au>
- Cc: public-appformats@w3.org
- Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.62.0701130304100.22379@dhalsim.dreamhost.com>
On Sat, 13 Jan 2007, Cameron McCormack wrote: > > In SVG 1.2 Full, we want to be able to define “traits” on bound > elements. These will allow custom elements to be animatable with SMIL > animation elements. An example of the syntax we wish to use is: > > <xbl:binding element="ex|star"> > <xbl:template> > <path …/> > </xbl:template> > <traitDef namespace="" name="cx" > valueType="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg#SVGLength"/> > <traitDef namespace="" name="cy" > valueType="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg#SVGLength"/> > <traitDef namespace="" name="r" > valueType="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg#SVGLength"/> > <traitDef namespace="" name="points" > valueType="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg#SVGNumber"/> > </xbl:binding> > > The SVG WG wishes to confirm that there is nothing in XBL 2.0 that would > preclude us from defining the traitDef element in this manner (see > http://www.w3.org/TR/2004/WD-SVG12-20041027/binding.html#traitDef-element). > If there is something that would preclude this, we request that it be > changed so that this is allowed. There is nothing that so precludes new elements being added to <binding> and the XBL processing model; indeed, the XBL2 specification explicitly allows non-XBL elements as children of both <xbl> and <binding> for this very reason. Cheers, -- Ian Hickson U+1047E )\._.,--....,'``. fL http://ln.hixie.ch/ U+263A /, _.. \ _\ ;`._ ,. Things that are impossible just take longer. `._.-(,_..'--(,_..'`-.;.'
Received on Saturday, 13 January 2007 03:05:33 UTC