- From: Jon Ferraiolo <jferrai@us.ibm.com>
- Date: Wed, 10 Jan 2007 10:02:52 -0800
- To: "Anne van Kesteren" <annevk@opera.com>
- Cc: "Dean Jackson" <dino@w3.org>, public-appformats@w3.org
- Message-ID: <OFE821BD1F.CEE352DE-ON8825725F.006204A5-8825725F.006323B5@us.ibm.com>
Anne, I generally agree with Dean, but more specifically: 1) The XBL spec's references section needs to distinguish between normative and informative references. 2) Normative references represent an indirect inclusion of a different specification. In most cases, it is not appropriate for W3C specifications to normatively reference specifications that get changed at the whim of the authors and/or which do not have an associated patent policy. (I think that's the thrust of Dean's email.) 3) It might be OK to reference the HTML5 spec as published by the WhatWG as an *informative* reference (particularly as a temporary editing solution), but it would be better if the features from the WhatWG's HTML5 spec were submitted to the W3C, discussed in appropriate W3C working groups for possible inclusion in W3C specs, and then have the XBL spec reference the relevant W3C specs informatively (or normatively if a required feature in XBL is defined within the other W3C spec). 4) If there is a need to recognize and congratulate the WhatWG for its HTML5 work somehow, then it makes sense to do this recognition within an acknowledgements section rather than the main body of the spec or the normative part of references section. Jon =Jon Ferraiolo <jferrai@us.ibm.com> Web Architect, Emerging Technologies IBM, Menlo Park, CA Mobile: +1-650-926-5865 "Anne van Kesteren" <annevk@opera.com To > "Dean Jackson" <dino@w3.org> Sent by: cc public-appformats public-appformats@w3.org -request@w3.org Subject Re: [XBL] - please remove reference to HTML5 01/10/2007 09:29 AM On Wed, 10 Jan 2007 14:56:34 +0100, Dean Jackson <dino@w3.org> wrote: > I think this isn't appropriate in a last call specification, and > especially not a candidate recommendation. Let me try again. How does the specification improve by removing that reference? In due course that reference will likely hold the information the reader wants to know. -- Anne van Kesteren <http://annevankesteren.nl/> <http://www.opera.com/>
Attachments
- image/gif attachment: graycol.gif
- image/gif attachment: pic17474.gif
- image/gif attachment: ecblank.gif
Received on Wednesday, 10 January 2007 18:03:15 UTC