- From: Cyril Concolato <cyril.concolato@enst.fr>
- Date: Wed, 10 Jan 2007 10:30:21 +0100
- To: Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>
- CC: "WAF WG (public)" <public-appformats@w3.org>
Ian Hickson a écrit : > On 1/9/07, Cyril Concolato <cyril.concolato@enst.fr> wrote: >> >>> As far as I can tell, the statement in the XBL spec is the same as >>> in the >>> SVG spec. >> >> The second sentence is wrong for SVG documents. The SVG specification >> explains the opposite in >> http://www.w3.org/TR/SVGMobile12/linking.html#externalReferences. >> "The conceptual model is that each resource document is loaded only >> once; >> if the same resource document is referenced multiple times directly or >> indirectly by the same primary document, that resource document is only >> retrieved and processed one time." > > That's not the opposite of what XBL says. That's exactly what XBL > says. Unless I made a mistake in the XBL spec, at any rate. Which is > the sentence in the XBL spec that disagrees with this? "Nested documents and images do not share binding documents with each other or with their container document." That sentence was saying "resources" instead of "binding documents" and was then disagreeing. Now, it's fine. I think that with the latest fixes, the whole section 8.1.1 is right, except that you could move the sentence "Binding documents that are currently loading count as binding documents that are already loaded for the purposes of this reuse mechanism." at the end of the section since the example below illustrates the sharing part and not the loading part. Concerning section 8.1.2, I'm not sure I agree. What are the cases that are covered by this sentence: "When the specification simply says that the external resource must be loaded" ? Regards, Cyril
Received on Wednesday, 10 January 2007 09:30:49 UTC